News

Recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus screening remain unchanged


 

AT AN NIH CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE

During a teleconference about the panel’s statement, Dr. VanDorsten said it operationally makes sense to get in line with what others are doing in using the 75-g one-time glucose challenge, the same test used in the nonpregnant population – but not yet.

"Until we have evidence that the benefits of extending the possible diagnosis outweigh the harms," he said, the panel did not find it is appropriate to recommend the single-step approach currently.

"We left the door ajar for reconsideration should these data be forthcoming," Dr. VanDorsten added. He noted that funding agencies will often follow with money for research after the NIH has identified research that is needed.

The panel agreed that "a single standard for screening and diagnostic thresholds for GDM should be established by professional organizations" but identified nine major research gaps that must be addressed in determining what this standard should be. These areas include the following:

• Defining the best strategy in developing a diagnostic approach that aligns more closely with international approaches in the most cost-effective manner possible.

• Determining whether women who would be diagnosed with GDM in the single-step – but not two-step – approach would gain benefit from the diagnosis and treatment.

• Understanding the cost-benefit implications of changing the diagnostic standard.

• Understanding the psychological consequences of a GDM diagnosis on women.

• Conducting cohort studies to show the "real-world" impact that GDM treatment has on practices and care utilization.

• Determining what lifestyle interventions might improve outcomes for pregnant women and their children.

• Assessing long-term impacts of changing the GDM diagnostic criteria.

• Understanding the "long-term metabolic, cardiovascular, developmental, and epigenetic impact on offspring whose mothers have been treated for GDM."

• Assessing what interventions might decrease GDM-diagnosed women’s risk of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

Dr. VanDorsten did not define a specific timeline regarding when the NIH would revisit this issue, but he noted that as more evidence becomes available from cohort studies and randomized trials reassessing diagnostic screening methods, a recommendation of the single-step method is possible in the future.

The 15 members of the panel include experts from maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, endocrinology and infertility, pediatrics, nutrition, epidemiology, economics, and statistics. The panel is an independent group whose members’ travel expenses are paid for by the NIH but who do not receive other compensation for serving on the panel.

Pages

Recommended Reading

DKA often the first recognized sign of type 1 diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
FDA withholds insulin degludec approval; wants safety data
MDedge Endocrinology
Critics dub JNC-8 as 'JNC-Late'
MDedge Endocrinology
Renal denervation improves glucose metabolism, sleep apnea
MDedge Endocrinology
Undiagnosed prediabetes pervasive among stroke survivors
MDedge Endocrinology
Bariatric surgery reduces mortality in obese diabetic patients
MDedge Endocrinology
Driving with diabetes is a matter of control
MDedge Endocrinology
Integrative care is the future of psychiatric care
MDedge Endocrinology
Exenatide, sitagliptin associated with doubled risk for acute pancreatitis
MDedge Endocrinology
Closed-loop artificial pancreas creeps closer to reality
MDedge Endocrinology

Related Articles