News

Antibiotic therapy an option for acute appendicitis

View on the News

‘Negative’ result but practical interpretation

This trial technically had a negative result because antibiotic therapy failed to meet the boundary for noninferiority, but in practical terms the findings fully justify a new approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

The study findings dispel the notion that appendectomy is always an emergency and suggest instead that, given our current precise diagnostic capabilities and effective wide-spectrum antibiotics, a trial of antibiotic therapy is reasonable. However, it’s important to note that children, adolescents, pregnant women, and patients with complications were excluded from this trial so the findings do not apply to those patient groups.

Edward Livingston, M.D., is deputy editor of JAMA. Corrine Vons, M.D., Ph.D., is in the digestive surgery department at Jean-Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France. They reported having no financial conflicts of interest. Dr. Livingston and Dr. Vons made these remarks in an editorial accompanying Dr. Salminen’s report (JAMA 2015;313:2327-8).


 

FROM JAMA

References

Antibiotic therapy failed to be shown as noninferior to surgery in a study of adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but it did resolve the problem and avert surgery with no adverse effects in 73% of patients, according to a report published online June 15 in JAMA.

Moreover, patients who did require surgery after initial antibiotic treatment did not develop significant complications and arguably were no worse off than were those who were operated on immediately. In fact, the overall complication rate was 2.8% among patients assigned to antibiotics and 7% among those assigned to antibiotics who eventually underwent appendectomy, compared with a 20.5% complication rate among patients assigned to surgery, said Dr. Paulina Salminen of the division of digestive surgery and urology, Turku (Finland) University Hospital, and her associates.

© decade3d/Thinkstockphotos

Their findings indicate that acute uncomplicated appendicitis need no longer be considered a surgical emergency, and that delaying the operation while trying a course of antibiotics “has few consequences,” they noted.

The few previous studies that have compared the two approaches had many limitations, including small study populations.

For their study, the Appendicitis Acuta (AAPAC) trial, Dr. Salminen and her associates included 530 patients aged 18-60 years who presented to six Finnish hospitals with suspected appendicitis during a 2-year period and were followed for 1 year. Appendicitis was confirmed via computed tomography (CT). Patients who had an appendicolith, perforation, abscess, or tumor were excluded from the study.

A total of 273 patients were randomly assigned to undergo immediate open appendectomy (with preoperative prophylactic antibiotics) and the remaining 257 were assigned to a 3-day course of IV ertapenem followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin and metronidazole. If progressive infection, perforation, or peritonitis was suspected, appendectomy was performed.

Previous studies of uncomplicated appendicitis treated with antibiotics found a 70%-80% success rate, so the researchers prespecified criteria for noninferiority to surgery at 75% for the study group.

The primary endpoint for the antibiotic group – resolution of acute appendicitis with no recurrences for a full year – occurred in 73%. The remaining 27% of patients in this group underwent appendectomy during follow-up, at a median of 102 days after initial presentation. None of these patients developed abscesses or serious infections, “suggesting that the decision to delay appendectomy ... can be made with a low likelihood of major complications,” the investigators said (JAMA 2015 June 15 [doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6154]). Nevertheless, antibiotic treatment did not qualify as noninferior to immediate surgery according to the study’s preset definitions, they said.

This study was supported by a government research grant from the EVO Foundation to Turku University Hospital. Dr. Salminen reported receiving lecture fees from Merck and Roche; there were no other financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

VIDEO: Do pathogenic intestinal bacteria drive scleroderma GI symptoms?
MDedge Family Medicine
First gut microbiota alterations described in systemic sclerosis patients
MDedge Family Medicine
New drugs saw ‘unprecedented’ spending growth in 2014
MDedge Family Medicine
Barrett’s esophagus increasing in frequency
MDedge Family Medicine
Celiac disease remains underdiagnosed
MDedge Family Medicine
Cholecystectomy guideline adherence reduces biliary pancreatitis recurrence
MDedge Family Medicine
Treament of IBS should focus on head as well as gut
MDedge Family Medicine
Confusion surrounding hepatic encephalopathy persists
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: New and emerging options for management of NAFLD
MDedge Family Medicine
Research focus on drug-induced liver injury on the rise
MDedge Family Medicine