News

Use team care to take advantage of Medicare chronic care fee

View on the News

Don’t take CCM to the bank – yet

Despite the analysis conducted by Dr. Basu and his colleagues, Medicare reimbursements for chronic care costs are still too vague to bank on such large estimated gains.

The $8-per-month CCM copayment may not be covered by insurance because many plans do not cover out-of-visit services. Patients may decline to pay for a service they do not see, believing that they already have their care coordinated. And because CCM is not limited to primary care, patients might also be unwilling to exclude their specialists from their care plans, because of a fear of losing access to them.

Because team-based models of CCM often require data sharing, the cost of electronic health records must also be factored into cost/revenue ratios, particularly since many EHR data systems still prevent successful information transfers, despite federal laws requiring interoperability.

If interoperability were truly effective and primary care providers had easy access to the data across systems required for care coordination, we might not have to hire other providers to do a job that has traditionally been ours alone.

Dr. Fitzhugh C. Pannill III is an internist at the University of Connecticut in Farmington. His comments were made in an editorial accompanying Dr. Basu’s report.


 

FROM ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

References

To make the most of the Medicare chronic care management (CCM) payment, have a nurse or other nonphysician provider deliver the care.

That was the conclusion reached by Dr. Sanjay Basu of Stanford (Calif.) University and his colleagues based on their analysis of national practice data on patient use of primary care services, staffing costs, overhead, and reimbursements, published Sept. 21 in Annals of Internal Medicine (doi:10.7326/M14-2677).

Up to two-thirds of Medicare-covered patients on primary care patient panels are eligible for the new CCM payment, unveiled earlier this year as part of Medicare’s move away from fee-for-service medicine, according to the researchers.

Dr. Basu and his colleagues created microsimulation models to determine that net revenue gains were highest when CCM plans were developed at an annual preventive care visit and in partnership with nonphysician providers who were then tasked with delivering the care.

If services were delivered by a registered nurse, revenue increased $332/CCM patient. When delivered by a licensed practical nurse, the increase was $372/CCM patient. And when a medical assistent delivered the care, revenue increased by $385/CCM patient.

For primary care practices with patient panels of about 2,000, if a minimum of 76 CCM patients per full-time equivalent physician were enrolled and cared for by a registered nurse, the net annual revenue increase was $75,000 per full-time physician when combined with the cost of 12 hours of weekly nursing services.

The analysis could incentivize practices to adapt more team-based models of care, regardless of practice size, Dr. Basu noted.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @whitneymcknight

Recommended Reading

Uninsured dropped by nearly 9 million between 2013 and 2014
MDedge Family Medicine
House votes to defund Planned Parenthood
MDedge Family Medicine
Appeals courts split on ACA contraception mandate
MDedge Family Medicine
Telehealth boom raises questions about proper practices
MDedge Family Medicine
Pioneer ACOs cut out low-value care
MDedge Family Medicine
IOM report: Teamwork key to reducing medical diagnostic errors
MDedge Family Medicine
Family medicine residents thinking temporary assignments, part-time work
MDedge Family Medicine
Medicolegal aspects of sleep apnea
MDedge Family Medicine
More expanded drug indications approved on less rigorous evidence
MDedge Family Medicine
ICD-10: Feds tout resources available for Oct. 1 switch
MDedge Family Medicine