Conference Coverage

The year in osteoarthritis


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM RWCS 2016

References

“This really brought a lot of folks to my office,” Dr. Troum recalled.

“Absolutely, this was big stuff,” Dr. Bergman agreed. “This became a nightmare for many of us because all of a sudden patients were scared to death about taking their NSAIDs.”

Intra-articular corticosteroids for knee osteoarthritis don’t accelerate cartilage deterioration

At last fall’s American College of Rheumatology meeting in San Francisco, Jeffrey B. Driban, Ph.D., of Tufts Medical Center, Boston, presented a double-blind, randomized trial of intra-articular injections of triamcinolone hexacetonide 40 mg versus saline quarterly for 2 years in 140 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with ultrasound evidence of synovitis. Participants underwent annual evaluation of periarticular bone and cartilage changes via MRI and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

After 2 years, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of pain scores, walk time, or other functional measures. The injections – eight in total over 2 years – were safe, with new-onset hypertension and hyperglycemia rates of 3% in this obese population. And most important of all, there were no major differences between the two groups in terms of quantitative or semiquantitative structural endpoints; in other words, the injections didn’t increase the rate of structural disease progression. The intra-articular steroid group showed a modestly greater rate of loss of cartilage thickness, which the investigators deemed of uncertain clinical significance.

“The structural changes were minimal,” Dr. Troum noted. “This is only a 2-year study, but I can say that I now feel more comfortable giving these injections in patients who for whatever reason can’t get surgery.”

Dr. Bergman said that many orthopedic surgeons talk up the potential risk that intra-articular steroid injections will accelerate cartilage damage. They place an arbitrary limit on the number of injections a patient can receive.

“I think this study really helps us push back and say, ‘No, I think you’re fine in getting this procedure,’” the rheumatologist commented.

Dr. Bergman and Dr. Troum reported having no financial conflicts regarding their presentation.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

ACR: No long-term benefit for knee OA steroid injections
MDedge Family Medicine
Jury still out on cannabinoid therapy for rheumatic diseases
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Chondroitin tops celecoxib in reducing knee OA structural progression
MDedge Family Medicine
ACR: Ozone injections reduce pain and improve function in knee OA
MDedge Family Medicine
Overweight, obese patients at greater risk for knee replacement surgery
MDedge Family Medicine
Synovitis, effusion associated with increased pain sensitivity
MDedge Family Medicine
ACR: Don’t be fooled by contaminated synovial fluid
MDedge Family Medicine
Lateral wedge insoles provide minimal biomechanical help in knee OA
MDedge Family Medicine
Radiography missed most clinical cases of hip osteoarthritis
MDedge Family Medicine
Thigh muscle weakness a risk factor for knee replacement in women
MDedge Family Medicine

Related Articles