Commentary

What do we really know about e-cigarettes?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

It’s been about 2 years since I had my first e-cigarette discussion with a patient. He was a smoker in his 30s and, since we routinely screen for tobacco use in our practice, I asked him if he was interested in quitting. He said he was cutting down by using e-cigarettes, but had not yet stopped smoking.

According to the 2 articles on e-cigarettes in this issue—one original research study about the prevalence of e-cigarette use in rural Illinois and one review of the safety of e-cigarettes—my experience with this patient is typical of e-cigarette users. Many are “dual users” who turn to e-cigarettes to try to cut down on their tobacco use.

Are e-cigarettes a “gateway” to the use of tobacco and other substances of abuse? Or do they represent an effective way to quit smoking?

As these 2 articles discuss, we still have a great deal to learn about the potential harms and benefits of e-cigarettes. What chemicals are people taking into their bodies and how dangerous are they? And even if they pose health risks, do e-cigarettes have value as smoking cessation aids if they are less harmful than tobacco?

One could simply take a “just say No” approach, as does my wife who says, “Any chemical you inhale into your lungs can’t be good for you!” Or, one can assume the more moderate lesser-of-two-evils stance of the British health system, which posits that there may be some benefit to e-cigarettes if they help people cut down or stop using tobacco products.

Are e-cigarettes a "gateway" to the use of tobacco and other substances of abuse? Or do they represent an effective way to quit smoking?

In writing this editorial, I conducted a quick literature search that yielded only 5 legitimate randomized trials of e-cigarettes to reduce or eliminate tobacco use, and the results were underwhelming. At best, e-cigarettes appear to be as effective as other forms of nicotine replacement, such as patches, which do not have chemical additives.

Fortunately, researchers are taking e-cigarettes seriously, and research is ongoing. Using the search term “e-cigarette” yielded 2058 references, indicating a respectable amount of e-cigarette research conducted over the past 6 years. Most of the research so far has been about the chemical constituents of the vapor people inhale or about use patterns. There is still a lack of definitive research on whether e-cigarettes are an effective smoking cessation method or a “gateway” to the use of tobacco and other substances of abuse.

Or perhaps they are both.

Hopefully, in 5 years we will know a great deal more, but until we do, I am happy to see that the US Food and Drug Administration has decided to regulate e-cigarettes like tobacco.

Recommended Reading

Varenicline, bupropion not tied to significant increase in neuropsychiatric events in smokers
MDedge Family Medicine
Infections kill many waiting for liver transplant, force others off list
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA panels recommend expanding REMS, requiring prescriber education, for ER/LA opioids
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA takes more steps to keep kids off tobacco products
MDedge Family Medicine
Tailor Alcoholics Anonymous principles for clinical practice, experts say
MDedge Family Medicine
Methadone programs allowed pregnancy outcomes similar to nonusers
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Post legalization, what effect is recreational marijuana use having on children?
MDedge Family Medicine
Putting an end to ENDS
MDedge Family Medicine
Study shines light on ‘invisible epidemic’
MDedge Family Medicine
Probuphine implant predicted to ease buprenorphine maintenance
MDedge Family Medicine

Related Articles

  • Original Research

    E-cigarettes: Who’s using them and why?

    Nearly 80% of smokers say they use e-cigarettes to cut down/quit smoking. But these dual users are more likely to “light up” first thing in the...

  • Applied Evidence

    E-cigarettes: How “safe” are they?

    Without tobacco, tar, ash, or carbon monoxide, e-cigarettes are marketed as “healthier” alternatives to cigarettes. But they are not without risk...