News

Extended pneumococcal vaccination schedule boosts early immunity for preemies

View on the News

Pneumococcal vaccine results point to challenges in vaccine policy

The needs of varying populations, the prevalence of various serotypes, and other local epidemiologic and economic factors all influence vaccination schedules. For PCV, the present study showed how widely seroprotection varied between serotypes and between different priming schedules.

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) can be devastating in the vulnerable preterm population, as can pneumococcal pneumonia. Though the current vaccination schedule recommendations in the United States takes into account age-related changes in the immune system, truly optimized vaccine delivery for all populations, including this vulnerable one, is still more a goal than a reality.

However, each of the schedules examined in this study have been studied in areas where they are in clinical use, and all are generally protective of IPD. The timing of other vaccinations, as well as economic and logistic realities, will also affect vaccination schedules, and must be taken into account.

The findings of this study show that no one schedule is best for all populations, and also highlight why those making vaccine policy around the globe will continue to arrive at varying answers when considering the needs of their populations.

Mark H. Sawyer, MD, is a professor of pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego. Mobeen Rathore, MD, is director of the University of Florida Center for HIV/AIDS Research, Education and Service. They had no conflicts of interest to declare. Their remarks are drawn from a companion commentary in Pediatrics (Pediatrics. 2016;138[3]:e20160975).


 

FROM PEDIATRICS

References

A randomized clinical trial evaluating three dosing strategies for 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) in preterm infants found that more widely spaced priming vaccinations resulted in higher immunoglobulin G (IgG) during the first 12 months of life, but reduced the immune response seen after the 12-month booster was given.

After the primary schedule, the percent of infants lacking seroprotection for more than one half of the serotypes in the PCV13 formulation was 25% on a reduced two-dose schedule, 12% on an accelerated schedule, and 3% on an extended schedule (P less than .001).

Conversely, “A reduced priming schedule of PCV13 resulted in higher post-booster IgG concentrations but lower post-primary concentrations,” wrote Alison Kent, MBChB, and her coinvestigators in the PUNS (Prems Under New Schedule) Study Group (Pediatrics. 2016;138[3]:e20153945).

©dina2001/Thinkstock

“Infants who received the extended schedule had lower fold increases in concentrations after booster vaccination than the other groups,” wrote Dr. Kent of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group and Vaccine Institute, St. George’s, University of London, and her collaborators. Participants receiving the extended schedule had lower geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies than did those on the reduced schedule for nine serotypes and those on the accelerated schedule for four serotypes.

The study enrolled 210 premature infants in a phase IV, controlled, open-label trial at 12 sites in the United Kingdom. Infants of less than 35 weeks gestation, and between 7 and 12 weeks of age, were randomly assigned to receive PCV13 on one of three schedules. The reduced schedule gave two priming doses at 2 and 4 months of age; the accelerated schedule gave the doses at 2, 3, and 4 months of age; and the extended schedule gave doses at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. All infants received a booster vaccination at 12 or 13 months of age, and all received a standard suite of childhood immunizations for other diseases. The entire study was completed by 194 patients.

Serotype-specific IgG concentrations were obtained pre-vaccination, 1 month after the primary vaccination, and before and 1 month after the booster vaccination was given. IgG levels were reported for each PCV serotype; “there was considerable variation between serotypes,” ranging from 0.16 ng/mL for serotype 6b on the reduced schedule to 8.49 ng/mL for serotype 14 on the extended schedule, the investigators said.

Dr. Kent and her collaborators also used logistic regression analysis to explore how the vaccine’s effectiveness was affected by a number of factors. These included gestational length, the receipt of blood transfusions or pre- or post-natal steroids, BCG vaccination, early postvaccination acetaminophen, and the presence of chronic lung disease.

Later gestation was associated with increased seroprotection for four serotypes at 2 months of age, and with an increase in post-primary vaccination IgG concentrations for three others (P-values ranging from P less than .001 to P = .021).

No other factors were associated with protective IgG levels at any point, except that receipt of prenatal steroids had a negative association with seroprotection for several serotypes. “At no time points were antenatal steroids associated with higher antibody concentrations,” wrote the investigators.

Most studies of immunogenicity of infant vaccination schedules have been completed using term infants, with limited knowledge about efficacy in preterm infants. Previous work had shown that preterm infants had lower IgG concentrations after the primary and booster vaccinations for eight serotypes of PCV, compared with term infants. “The lower immunogenicity ... is concerning because premature infants are also less likely to benefit from the protective maternal antibodies transferred during late pregnancy,” Dr. Kent and her coauthors wrote.

The lower booster immunogenicity after the extended schedule is an effect that has been previously observed with other vaccinations and may be related to the formation of immune complexes with previously existing antibodies with the vaccine antigen, said Dr. Kent and her coauthors. The variation in immunogenicity timing for the various priming schedules, they said, will be helpful for those caring for preterm infants, enabling them “to consider this finding in the context of their own immunization programs and epidemiologic situations.”

The study was funded by Pfizer as an investigator-led study, without Pfizer’s input on the conduct of the trial, analysis of data, interpretation of results, or the preparation of this manuscript. Pfizer manufactures Prevnar 13.

koakes@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @karioakes

Recommended Reading

HPV vaccination rates not improved by increased awareness
MDedge Family Medicine
DTaP/IPV plus bivalent rLP2086 vaccine deemed noninferior in adolescents
MDedge Family Medicine
Meningococcal B vaccine less protective than expected during outbreak
MDedge Family Medicine
Motivational interviewing for HPV vaccination well accepted by doctors
MDedge Family Medicine
Coadministering a combined MMRV vaccine with MenC vaccine is immunogenic
MDedge Family Medicine
Influenza: A vaccine we love to hate
MDedge Family Medicine
Approximately 9 million U.S. children, teens are vulnerable to measles infection
MDedge Family Medicine
Zika virus RNA detected in serum beyond previously estimated time frame
MDedge Family Medicine
NIH launches trial of Zika vaccine candidate
MDedge Family Medicine
Combo MenC vaccine loses effectiveness after 5 years
MDedge Family Medicine