Clinical Inquiries

How do clinical prediction rules compare with joint fluid analysis in diagnosing gout?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

American Rheumatology Association, New York, and Rome prediction rules

A study of 82 Veterans Administration patients compared the American Rheumatology Association (ARA), New York, and Rome prediction rules with regard to their ability to diagnose gout with synovial urate crystals.6 The ARA criteria for gout diagnosis require either tophi or monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid, or 6 out of a list of 12 other criteria.7

The New York prediction rule requires that patients meet 2 or more of the following criteria: at least 2 attacks of painful joint swelling with complete resolution within 2 weeks, podagra, tophi, and rapid response to colchicine treatment, defined as a major reduction in the objective signs of inflammation within 48 hours.

The Rome prediction rule requires meeting 2 of 3 criteria: serum uric acid >7 mg/dL in men and >6 mg/dL in women, presence of tophi, and history of attacks of painful joint swelling with abrupt onset and resolution within 2 weeks.

The New York prediction rule had the highest positive likelihood ratio of 4.4 compared with the ARA (1.8) and Rome (4.3) rules.6 The utility of the New York and Rome rules, although they have fewer criteria than ARA, is limited by the fact that they include a previous episode of joint swelling and tophi. These criteria increase their specificity but make them less useful in diagnosing a first episode of gout, when tophi are unlikely to have developed.

Prediction rules are more sensitive in established gout

The new ACR prediction rule was compared with the ARA, Rome, and New York clinical prediction rules using urate crystals as the gold standard in early (less than 2 years) and established disease (longer than 2 years).8 All clinical prediction rules were more sensitive in established disease than early disease (95.3% vs 84.1%; P<.001) and more specific in early disease than established disease (79.9% vs 52.5%; P<.001).

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

How best to approach urine drug testing (and the one key question to ask)
MDedge Family Medicine
A step-wise approach to exertional leg pain
MDedge Family Medicine
Pain starting in knee later arises in other joints
MDedge Family Medicine
AAP report flags risks of prescribing codeine for children
MDedge Family Medicine
Adding foot screening to eye clinic catches diabetic neuropathy
MDedge Family Medicine
Recurrent right upper quadrant abdominal pain
MDedge Family Medicine
Heart failure risk with individual NSAIDs examined in study
MDedge Family Medicine
Beta-blockers reduce pain, opioid use in osteoarthritis
MDedge Family Medicine
Experts: Fewer opioids, more treatment laws mean nothing without better access to care
MDedge Family Medicine
Two migraine prevention drugs prove no better than placebo in children
MDedge Family Medicine