Department of Neurology (Dr. Morris), Department of Family Medicine (Dr. Carter), Maine Medical Center, Portland; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School and Barre Family Health Center (Dr. Martin) stmartin@gmail.com
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
From The Journal of Family Practice | 2017;66(7):420-422,424-427.
References
Determining whether mechanical interventions are needed
Almost all conditions leading to stroke warrant active medical management, but a few benefit from procedural intervention, as well.
Extracranial carotid atherosclerosis.Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting is recommended as secondary prevention for patients with a history of stroke or TIA who have ipsilateral high-grade extracranial carotid stenosis of 70% to 99% and, in some cases, 50% to 69%.3,9,20 In patients with mild non-disabling stroke, the optimal timing for these procedures is within 2 weeks of the ischemic event. A delay of 6 weeks is generally preferred for moderate or larger strokes to allow for some healing of the injured brain.
The choice of procedure is based on risk profile, with the most important factor being age. For patients >70 years, endarterectomy is preferred because stenting is associated with an increased risk of stroke.3,9,10 Experts do not recommend either procedure for patients who have had a severe disabling stroke. Generally speaking, these procedures have higher rates of success when they are performed in centers that perform a higher number of these procedures.10
Vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis.Due to generally good compensatory blood flow of the contralateral vertebral artery in the setting of vertebral artery stenosis, and an unacceptably high complication rate of angioplasty and stenting in the basilar artery, medical management is typically the first-line approach. If a patient has recurrent symptoms in the setting of optimal medical management and a focal lesion that is amenable to an endovascular intervention (most commonly a vertebral artery origin high-grade stenosis), angioplasty and stenting may be considered.10
Intracranial atherosclerosis.Similarly, medical management is the preferred strategy for intracranial atherosclerosis. Angioplasty and/or stenting are reserved for complex cases or recurrence despite adherence to secondary stroke prevention measures. Ideally, these patients should be managed with long-term aspirin 81 mg/d, adjunctive clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 90 days post stroke, a high-intensity statin, BP optimization, and any relevant lifestyle interventions.13
Patent foramen ovale.Research to date has not shown that closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is superior to medical therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients <60 years with cryptogenic stroke.12,46,47 The decision to anticoagulate these patients should be based on the presence or absence of a DVT and not on a PFO alone. In patients with an identified DVT and a contraindication to oral anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filter placement should be considered. For patients with ongoing prothrombotic risk thought to increase the chances of future paradoxical embolism, closure of the PFO may be considered.
CORRESPONDENCE Stephen A. Martin, MD, EdM, Barre Family Health Center, 151 Worcester Road, Barre, MA 01005; stmartin@gmail.com.