From the Journals

Recommendations for infant sleep position are not being followed

View on the News

Clear, consistent message is needed

Over the 10 years spanning 1994-2004, the sudden infant death syndrome rate in the United States fell by 53%, correlating with an increase in exclusive supine sleep from less than 10% to 78%. However, since then, rates of both supine sleep and SIDS death have remained stagnant.

To make progress in these areas, current data are needed on supine sleep to enhance understanding of how families make these decisions. Colson et al. provide exactly the kind of information we need to guide providers and public health officials in their efforts to help families maintain the safest sleep environments for their infants.

As a start, mothers who want to practice safe sleep need to be empowered to insist that other caregivers in their lives support their parenting decisions, because the study shows that mothers who feel that they have more control are more likely to use the recommended position. We also must look at how we can help change personal attitudes and societal norms in favor of supine sleep because these issues were found to be some of the strongest predictors of prone sleep position.

We, as health care providers, need to provide clear and consistent messaging in both word and behavior to help mothers make safe decisions for their infants.

Michael H. Goodstein, MD, is a neonatologist at WellSpan York (Pa.) Hospital. Barbara M. Ostfeld, PhD, is the program director of the SIDS Center of New Jersey at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Their remarks accompanied the article by Colson et al. (Pediatrics 2017 Aug 21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2068). Neither author reported any financial disclosures.


 

FROM PEDIATRICS

Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that parents place infants supine for sleeping, many mothers do not do so, according to the results of the Study of Attitudes and Factors Affecting Infant Care.

Baby in supine position

Several other discrepancies in compliance with the AAP recommendation also were noted. African American mothers were more likely to intend to use prone position, compared with white mothers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.85). Those who did not complete high school were also more likely to intend to use the prone position (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.16-3.73). On the other hand, those who received recommendation-compliant advice from a doctor were less likely to place their infants in the prone (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93) or side (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67) positions.

“Of particular note, those who reported that their social norms supported placing the infant in the prone position were much more likely to do so, compared with those who felt that their social norms supported using only the supine position (aOR, 11.6; 95% CI, 7.24-18.7). And, most remarkably, those who had positive attitudes about the prone sleep position ... were more likely to choose the prone position (aOR, 130; 95% CI, 71.8-236),” the researchers wrote. These findings indicate that choices in infant sleeping position are directly influenced by attitudes toward the choice, subjective social norms, and perceptions about control.

“These beliefs persist and are potentially modifiable, so they should be considered an important part of any intervention to change practice,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues wrote.

The study was a nationally representative sample of mothers of infants aged 2-6 months. Although the data were taken from patient surveys, which could have been misreported, they are supported by the findings of other studies.

“Maternal race and education continue to be factors associated with choice of infant sleeping position as does advice from a doctor. Factors that appear to be of equal or greater importance are those related to attitudes, subjective social norms, and perceived control, all of which can potentially be altered through educational interventions,” Dr. Colson and her colleagues concluded.

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health funded the study. The authors reported no financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Prenatal methadone maintenance linked to poorer child neurodevelopment
MDedge Family Medicine
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines modestly reduce complex acute otitis media
MDedge Family Medicine
Maternal protection against measles steadily declines prior to vaccination
MDedge Family Medicine
Early neuroimaging essential for Zika-exposed neonates
MDedge Family Medicine
Procalcitonin-guided decision making found best in neonatal suspected sepsis
MDedge Family Medicine
Extreme caffeine use in early pregnancy risks offspring behavioral disorders
MDedge Family Medicine
Mobile messages support safe sleep practices
MDedge Family Medicine
Researchers identify ‘congenital NAD deficiency disorders’
MDedge Family Medicine
Opening the door to gene editing?
MDedge Family Medicine
Alternative birthing practices increase risk of infection
MDedge Family Medicine