Clinical Inquiries

Which interventions are effective in managing parental vaccine refusal?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Corrective information doesn’t help with the most worried parents

A subsequent RCT tested whether correcting the myth that the flu vaccine can give people the flu would reduce belief in the misconception, increase perceptions that the flu vaccine is safe, and increase vaccination intent.4 Respondents to a national online poll of 1000 people received one of 3 interventions: correctional education (information debunking the myth), risk education (information about the risks of influenza infection), or no additional education.

Although about a third of parents cite herd immunity as a motivation to vaccinate, its efficacy in addressing vaccine hesitancy isn't clear.

Corrective information about the flu vaccine reduced the false belief that the vaccine can cause the flu by 15% to 20% and that the flu vaccine is unsafe by 5% to 10% (data from graphs; P<.05 for both effects). However, corrective information actually decreased parental intention to vaccinate among the group most concerned about the adverse effects of the vaccine (data from graph and text: +5% in the low-concern group vs −18% in the high-concern group; P<.05).

A presumptive approach works—but at a cost

A subsequent observational study videotaped 111 patient-provider vaccine discussions.5 Researchers categorized the initiation of the vaccine discussion as presumptive (eg, “We have to do some shots.”) or participatory (eg, “What do you want to do about shots?”). Using a presumptive style was more likely to result in acceptance of all recommended vaccines by the end of the visit (90% vs 17%; P<.05), but it decreased the chance of a highly rated visit experience (63% vs 95%; P<.05).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Pink Book recommends a combination of strategies, aimed at both providers and the public, for increasing and maintaining high immunization rates. The Pink Book advises providers to be ready to address vaccine safety concerns raised by parents.6

In a 2012 guideline, the CDC encouraged providers to listen attentively, be ready with scientific information and reliable resources, and use appropriate anecdotes in communicating with vaccine-hesitant parents.7 The guideline recommended against excluding families who refuse vaccination from the practice.

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Vaccine coverage high among U.S. toddlers in 2016, but gaps remain
MDedge Family Medicine
DTaP vaccination rate highest in Maryland
MDedge Family Medicine
PCVs may reduce AOM severity, although they do not decrease incidence
MDedge Family Medicine
MACRA Monday: Pneumococcal vaccination
MDedge Family Medicine
MMR vaccine coverage at 94% in kindergartners
MDedge Family Medicine
Chinese school-based flu vaccination program reduced outbreaks
MDedge Family Medicine
A program to increase flu vaccine compliance
MDedge Family Medicine
Parents have diverse reasons for refusing HPV vaccine for their child
MDedge Family Medicine
Biologics during pregnancy did not affect infant vaccine response
MDedge Family Medicine
The rising cost of the pneumococcal vaccine: What gives?
MDedge Family Medicine