Feature

Report: Abortion in U.S. is safe and effective

View on the News

Restrictions lead to lower-quality care

On March 16, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine released a comprehensive report finding that abortion is safe and effective but inaccessible to many women.

Dr. Eve Espey of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Dr. Eve Espey

Specifically, the National Academies determined that abortion complications are rare, that abortion does not increase physical or mental health risks, and that a variety of trained clinicians can provide safe abortion care. Using the 2001 Institute of Medicine six dimensions for assessing quality of abortion care, the National Academies determined that in states with the most abortion restrictions, women received lower quality care. Restrictions that require waiting periods, non–evidence based counseling, and medically unnecessary services, among others, significantly reduce access and the quality of care, particularly for low-income women.

A high-quality foundation of evidence, contributed to by many U.S. family planning researchers, provided the studies on which the conclusions of the National Academies are based. We are fortunate that the Society of Family Planning provides research funding and a forum for family planning researchers to continue to produce the high-quality evidence used by policy makers to improve access to and quality of abortion care.

Eve Espey, MD, MPH, is professor and chair of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. She reported having no relevant financial disclosures.


 


The committee was not able to find high-quality research to evaluate the risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage or stillbirth, or long-term mortality associated with abortion. However, it did find an increased risk of preterm birth before 28 weeks’ gestation in a nulliparous women who had had two or more aspiration abortions, compared with women with no abortion history. The risk of preterm birth is greater in women if the interval between their abortion and their next conception is less than 6 months. The same risk exists for short intervals between pregnancy in general, the committee noted.

Overall, they wrote, “serious complications are rare and occur much less frequently than during childbirth.”

The committee identified several kinds of state-level regulations that are obstacles to effective abortion care in the United States. Such regulations “may limit the number of available providers, misinform women of the risks of the procedures they are considering, overrule women’s and clinicians’ medical decision making, or require medically unnecessary services and delays in care.” Some laws “prohibit the abortion method that is most effective for a particular clinical circumstance” (for example, D&E).

Access to care varies widely geographically, and 17% of women must travel more than 50 miles to obtain an abortion. Regulations that required counseling, whether the woman desires counseling or not, are cited as an example of inferior patient-centered care.

Recommended Reading

MDedge Daily News: Could gut bacteria trigger autoimmune diseases?
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA proposes lower nicotine levels in cigarettes
MDedge Family Medicine
Office staff cohesiveness remains important
MDedge Family Medicine
MedPAC to Congress: Eliminate MIPS
MDedge Family Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Three daily meals best in type 2 diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
How the ADA shapes health care
MDedge Family Medicine
MDedge Daily News: MedPAC targets Medicare’s pay plans
MDedge Family Medicine
Survey: Litigation fears drive response to FDA power morcellator warnings
MDedge Family Medicine
MDedge Daily News: Stem cells may reverse premature menopause
MDedge Family Medicine
Women in medicine shout #MeToo about sexual harassment at work
MDedge Family Medicine