Applied Evidence

Strategies for caring for the well cancer survivor

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Yet adherence to cancer surveillance recommendations is poor. A study of patients with colon cancer demonstrated that only 12% met all recommended surveillance guidelines.16 A study of patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy showed that only 9% met recommended surveillance more than 2 years after diagnosis.17 Those dismal statistics may be the result of provider oversight—not patient reluctance.

In the colon cancer study, for example, compliance with follow-up colonoscopy was 80% but compliance with carcinoembryonic antigen testing was only 22%.16 In the bladder cancer study, follow-up urine cytology was obtained in only 23% of patients, although 75% completed recommended imaging.17

Although surveillance remains the oncologist’s responsibility, visits to the FP provide an opportunity to review surveillance and order needed laboratory testing and other studies, including imaging.

3. Screen for new cancers

The risk of a second cancer is elevated for cancer survivors compared with the risk of a primary cancer in the healthy general population; some survivors have a lifetime risk of a second cancer as high as 36%.18 Risk varies by cancer type (TABLE 319). Some of this variation is due to the impact of smoking: Smoking-related cancers have the highest risk of second malignancy.19 Genetic predisposition to malignant transformation is also theorized to contribute to increased risk. Second malignancies are dangerous; 55% of patients die of the second cancer compared with only 13% of their initial cancer.19

Relative risk of second cancer after primary cancer

A study of colorectal cancer survivors showed that primary care visits increased in each of the 5 years after diagnosis, during which time oncology visits decreased steadily.

Studies show that cancer survivors display varying adherence with recommended screening for second cancers. In a study of Latina cancer survivors, depressive symptoms were associated with lower screening compliance.20 A study of survivors of hematologic cancer showed a low rate of cancer screening and high fear of cancer recurrence—suggesting avoidance due to fear.21 Other studies, however, show similar or increased compliance with screening in cancer survivors.22,23 A meta-analysis of 19 studies determined that, overall, cancer survivors receive 25% to 38% more recommended screening than the general population.24

Continue to: Few guidelines exist to guide FPs...

Pages

Recommended Reading

MRI doubles rate of observation in low-risk prostate cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
Top cancer researcher fails to disclose corporate financial ties in major research journals
MDedge Family Medicine
Hormonal contraceptive use linked to leukemia risk in offspring
MDedge Family Medicine
Colonoscopy: Should 45 be the new 50?
MDedge Family Medicine
Can tai chi tame seniors’ risk of falls?
MDedge Family Medicine
Growth lateral to right eye
MDedge Family Medicine
NELSON trial: CT Screening reduces lung cancer deaths
MDedge Family Medicine
Does America have a gabapentinoid problem?
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA approves oral dacomitinib for some metastatic NSCLC
MDedge Family Medicine
Researchers share Nobel Prize for cancer immunotherapy discoveries
MDedge Family Medicine