Laws on pregnancy, substance use
Dr. House considered those findings within the context of current laws governing substance use during pregnancy.
, with prosecution usually requiring detection of the substance at birth or during pregnancy, or evidence of risk to the child’s health.Tennessee is unique in considering substance abuse in pregnancy assault if the child is born with dependence or other harm from the drug use. Women in Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin can be subject to civil commitment, including required inpatient drug treatment, for substance abuse during pregnancy (Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;173[11]:1077-80).
Mandatory reporting laws for suspected substance abuse during pregnancy exist in 15 states, mostly in the Southwest, northern Midwest, and states around the District of Columbia. And four states – Kentucky, Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota – require pregnant women suspected of substance abuse to be tested.
Yet, most major relevant medical associations oppose criminalization of substance use during pregnancy, including the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry, the American Medical Association, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
“They are generally for increasing access for people, like voluntary screening, but against criminalization because it creates a barrier to accessing prenatal care,” Dr. House explained.
Aside from the question of whom psychiatrists consider their patients – the woman, her fetus, or both – the results raise another question, Dr. House said: “While studies have shown that criminalizing substance use during pregnancy discourages mothers from seeking prenatal care, does the threat of an involuntary psychiatric admission have a similar consequence?” That’s a question for further research.
No external funding was used. Dr. House was a clinical investigator without compensation for Janssen Pharmaceuticals from 2015 to 2017.