PURLs

What’s the best treatment setting for stable PE patients?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Of the 1127 eligible patients, 1081 were included in the matched cohort, with 576 (53%) treated as hospitalized patients and 505 (47%) treated as outpatients. The mean age of the matched cohorts was 63.2 years for the inpatient group and 63.6 years for the outpatient group. Overall, the cohorts were well matched.

The 14-day rate of adverse events was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (13% vs 3.3%; odds ratio [OR] = 5.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-15.28), with each of the adverse events that made up the primary outcome occurring more frequently in the hospitalized group (TABLE). The rate of adverse events at 3 months was also greater for hospitalized patients compared with outpatients (21.7% vs 6.9%; OR = 4.9; 95% CI, 2.62-9.17). The results remained similar for high-risk patients (Class III-V) based on their PESI score.

Comparison of inpatient vs outpatient treatment of patients with PE

WHAT’S NEW

A higher rate of AEs in those treated as inpatients vs outpatients

This trial supports the CHEST guideline recommendations3 to manage hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE as outpatients. It adds to the conversation by demonstrating higher rates of adverse events with hospitalization, even in high-risk subgroups (PESI Class III-V).

CAVEATS

A good study, but it wasn’t an RCT

While this is a well-designed cohort study, it is not a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study defined outpatient management as patients discharged from the ED or hospitalized for <48 hours. However, only 59 of the 544 patients in the outpatient group were early hospital discharges, while the rest were never admitted. Finally, a specialized thrombosis clinic followed up with the patients within 24 hours of discharge, and patients had telephone access to specialized health care professionals; such organization of care contributed to the safe outpatient management of these PE patients.

Continue to: CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

Copyright © 2018. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon jfp06712777_methodology.pdf336.17 KB

Recommended Reading

‘Phenomenal’ REDUCE-IT establishes triglyceride theory
MDedge Family Medicine
Tofacitinib and TNF inhibitors show similar VTE rates
MDedge Family Medicine
Mylan issues voluntary recall of certain valsartan-containing products
MDedge Family Medicine
CARDIA: Smoke-free policies linked to lower blood pressure
MDedge Family Medicine
Tested: U.S. News & World Report hospital rankings
MDedge Family Medicine
Teva recalls valsartan-containing combo pills
MDedge Family Medicine
Healthier lifestyle in midlife women reduces subclinical carotid atherosclerosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Evidence coming on best preeclampsia treatment threshold
MDedge Family Medicine
Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in U.S.
MDedge Family Medicine
ARISTOPHANES: Apixaban edges other DOACS for octogenarians
MDedge Family Medicine