Conference Coverage

Bilateral salpingectomy gains favor for sterilization


 

EXPERT COMMENTARY FROM ACOG 2019

Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy is gaining favor as an approach to sterilization, including in the vaginal delivery setting.

Dr. Eve Espey, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Sharon Worcester/MDedge News

Dr. Eve Espey

“[It is] probably the newest thing on the block ... this is becoming super widespread,” Eve Espey, MD, said of the procedure during a contraceptive update at the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Although evidence directly supporting bilateral salpingectomy for sterilization is lacking, there are good reasons to consider it, she said.

For example, the procedure is likely more effective than tubal ligation with no increased risk for complications, and is probably more likely to cut ovarian cancer risk than is tubal ligation, explained Dr. Espey, professor and chair of the department of obstetrics and gynecology and director of the family planning fellowship at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

“So we don’t actually have good [randomized controlled trials] on effectiveness for [bilateral] salpingectomy, but it is most like a partial salpingectomy, which is highly effective, so there is reason to believe that it might be more effective,” she added. The downsides are that the procedure may take longer, it may impair ovarian blood supply, and long-term population-level data on outcomes are lacking.

ACOG said in a 2015 committee opinion that when counseling women, bilateral salpingectomy can be discussed and considered “a method that provides effective contraception,” but also stressed the need for randomized controlled trials to support any related reduction in ovarian cancer risk. That opinion (#620) was replaced in April 2019 by Committee Opinion #774, which addresses opportunistic salpingectomy for epithelial ovarian cancer prevention, and which states that “the risks and benefits of salpingectomy should be discussed with patients who desire permanent sterilization.”

“[The Society of Gynecologic Oncology] is much, much more emphatic,” Dr. Espey said, citing a 2013 Clinical Practice Statement calling for discussion and consideration of risk-reducing salpingectomy in lieu of tubal ligation for women at average risk of ovarian cancer (after childbearing).

Dr. Espey also noted that during a recent grand rounds on sterilization, about 90% of participants said they were doing bilateral salpingectomy in the setting of vaginal delivery. “So I think we’re going to see this coming not just with C-section, but also with vaginal delivery.”

Dr. Espey reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

FDA orders companies to cease all sales of transvaginal mesh for POP repair
MDedge Family Medicine
Malpractice: Diagnostic errors top allegation involving children
MDedge Family Medicine
Managing 2nd trimester loss: Shared decision making, honor patient preference
MDedge Family Medicine
Appendectomy linked to increased risk of subsequent Parkinson’s
MDedge Family Medicine
Severe OSA increases cardiovascular risk after surgery
MDedge Family Medicine
Study identifies predictors of bariatric surgery attrition
MDedge Family Medicine
High-intensity statins may cut risk of joint replacement
MDedge Family Medicine
PPI metabolism may be altered in about one-third of bariatric surgery candidates
MDedge Family Medicine
Bundled payment for OA surgery linked to more emergency department visits
MDedge Family Medicine
Asymptomatic gallstones seldom require surgical intervention
MDedge Family Medicine