Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, NY (Drs. Zarrabi, Gemmill, and Baer); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, NY (Dr. Baer); Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr. Safaee) Kayvan.zarrabi@gmail.com
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Does rash correlate with cancer treatment efficacy?
Despite troubling dermatologic effects of cancer therapies, a retrospective analysis of several clinical trials has revealed another side to this coin: namely, the appearance, and the severity, of a rash correlates positively with objective tumor response.14 That correlation allows the oncologist to use a rash as a surrogate marker of treatment efficacy20 (although, notably, there remains a lack of prospective trials that would validate a rash as such a marker). Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors are mainly prescribed in patients who harbor an activating EGFR mutation; no studies have stratified patients by EGFR mutation and incidence of rash.33
The upshot? Although there are gaps in our understanding of the relationship between a rash and overall survival, we are nevertheless presented with this paradigm: A patient who is taking an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and who develops a rash should be continued on that treatment for as long as can be tolerated, because the rash is presumed to be a sign that the patient is deriving the greatest clinical benefit from therapy.14,20,33
CORRESPONDENCE Kevin Zarrabi, MD, MSc, Department of Medicine, Health Science Center T16, Room 020, Stony Brook, NY 11790-8160; Kayvan.zarrabi@gmail.com
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Ali John Zarrabi, MD, provided skillful editing of the manuscript of this article.