Advanced team-based care: How we made it work

,; ,; ,

Applied Evidence

Advanced team-based care: How we made it work

J Fam Pract. 2019 September;68(7):E1-E8

PDF Download

References

1. Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, et al. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:272-278.

2. Reuben DB, Knudsen J, Senelick W, et al. The effect of a physician partner program on physician efficiency and patient satisfaction. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1190-1193.

3. Hopkins K, Sinsky CA. Team-based care: saving time and improving efficiency. Fam Pract Manag. 2014;21:23-29.

4. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:753-760.

5. Shanafelt TD, Mungo M, Schmitgen J, et al. Longitudinal study evaluating the association between physician burnout and changes in professional work effort. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:422-431.

6. Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, West CP, et al. Professional satisfaction and the career plans of US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1625-1635.

7. Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1600-1613.

8. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:573-576.

9. Sinsky CA, Sinsky TA, Althaus D, et al. Practice profile. ‘Core teams’: nurse-physician partnerships provide patient-centered care at an Iowa practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:966-968.

10. Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1826-1832.

11. Association for Advancing Physician and Provider Recruitment. Schutte L. What you don’t know can cost you: building a business case for recruitment and retention best practices. 2012. https://member.aappr.org/general/custom.asp?page=696. Accessed June 20, 2019.

12. American Medical Association. AMA STEPS Forward. Expanded rooming and discharge protocols. https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702600. Accessed June 20, 2019.

13. American Medical Association. AMA STEPS Forward. Team documentation. https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702598?resultClick=3&bypassSolrId=J_2702598. Accessed June 20, 2019.

14. American Medical Association. AMA STEPS Forward. EHR in-basket restructuring for improved efficiency. https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2702694?resultClick=3&bypassSolrId=J_2702694. Accessed June 20, 2019.

15. California Health Care Foundation. Bodenheimer T, Bauer L, Olayiwola JN. RN role reimagined: how empowering registered nurses can improve primary care. https://www.chcf.org/publication/rn-role-reimagined-how-empowering-registered-nurses-can-improve-primary-care/. Accessed June 20, 2019.

16. Chung S, Lesser LI, Lauderdale DS, et al. Medicare annual preventive care visits: use increased among fee-for-service patients, but many do not participate. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34:11-20.

17. American Medical Association. AMA Policy H-160.912. The structure and function of interprofessional health care teams. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/The%20Structure%20and%20Function%20of%20Interprofessional%20Health%20Care%20Teams?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-727.xml. Accessed June 20, 2019.

18. Milani RV, Lavie CJ. Health care 2020: reengineering health care delivery to combat chronic disease. Am J Med. 2015;128:337-343.

19. Hill RG Jr, Sears LM, Melanson SW. 4000 clicks: a productivity analysis of electronic medical records in a community hospital ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:1591-1594.

20. Babbott S, Manwell LB, Brown R, et al. Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:e100-e106.

21. Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:836-848.

22. RAND Corporation. Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Ban Busum KR, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR439.html. Accessed June 20, 2019.

23. Evaluation and Management (E/M) visit frequently asked questions (FAQs): physician fee schedule (PPS). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeeSched/Downloads/E-M-Visit-FAQs-PFS.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2019.

24. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Scribe services signature requirements. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/2017-Transmittals-Items/R713PI.html. Accessed June 20, 2019.

25. American Association of Medical Assistants. State scope of practice laws. http://www.aama-ntl.org/employers/state-scope-of-practice-laws. Accessed June 20, 2019.

26. Misra-Hebert AD, Amah L, Rabovsky A, et al. Medical scribes: how do their notes stack up? J Fam Pract. 2016;65:155-159.

27. Arya R, Salovich DM, Ohman-Strickland P, et al. Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:490-494.

28. Bank AJ, Obetz C, Konrardy A, et al. Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: a prospective study. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:399-406.

29. Anderson P, Halley MD. A new approach to making your doctor-nurse team more productive. Fam Pract Manag. 2008;15:35-40.

3. New billable services. Billing for RN blood pressure checks, AWVs, and extended care team services have helped make aTBC at Bellin financially feasible. Revenue from RN visits, for example, was $630,000 in 2018.

4. Improved access for patients. Of the 130 primary care providers now on aTBC, 15 (11.5%) had closed their practices to new patients before aTBC. Now, all of their practices are open to new patients, which has improved access to care. In a 2018 patient access survey, 96.6% of patients obtained an appointment as soon as they thought it was needed, compared with 70.7% of patients before the transition to aTBC.

Greater opportunity for financial sustainability. The combination of improved quality measures and decreased cost of care in the Bellin aTBC bodes well for future success in a value-based world. We have realized a significant increase in value-based payments for improved quality, and in our Next Gen Accountable Care Organization (ACO) patients, we have seen a decrease of $29 in per-member-per-month costs, likely due to the use of nonphysicians in expanded roles. In addition, hospital admissions have decreased by 5% due to the ability of ambulatory teams to manage more complex patients in the office setting. This model has also allowed physicians and APCs to increase their panel size, another key value-based metric. From 2016 to 2018, panel size for primary care providers increased by an average of 8%.

Enhanced ability to retain and recruit. Several of Bellin’s primary care recruits indicated that they had interviewed only at practices incorporating team-based care. This trend may increase as residencies transition to team-based models of care.

So how did we do?

Metrics of Bellin’s aTBC success

By the end of 2018, all 130 primary care physicians and APCs at Bellin had made the transition to this model, representing family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. We have now begun the transition of our non-primary care specialties to team-based care.

Continue to: In the aTBC model...