From the Journals

Fertility delay varied with contraceptive method in study


 

FROM THE BMJ

Managing expectations helps patients plan

“The question of return to fertility is one that many patients who use contraception have unless they have completed their child bearing,” said Sarah W. Prager, MD, of the University of Washington, Seattle, in an interview. “For patients who want to plan a pregnancy, knowing what to expect in terms of return to fertility is important so they can make sure they are in the space and place they want to be with their health, life, job, and partner,” she said.

Dr. Prager said she was not surprised by the study findings because they agree with previously published data. “Overall, except for the injection, people using any form of contraception are back to their baseline fertility within a few months,” she noted. “It also makes perfect sense for return to fertility to be longer with the injection, as it is designed to prevent pregnancy for 16 weeks after the injection is given. Unlike all the other methods, it cannot be removed from the body once given,” she said.

“Clinicians should continue to advise patients that their return to baseline fertility is relatively rapid with any contraception other than the Depo-Provera injection,” said Dr. Prager. “There are no data to support a benefit in switching from an IUD or implant to a combination hormonal method (pills, patch, ring) before starting to try to conceive,” she said.

“This study tries to account for differences in baseline fertility for people using the different methods, but since the choice of method was not randomized, there could still be baseline differences that were not measured or accounted for,” Dr. Prager noted. “A randomized study would certainly eliminate some of these biases; however, I don’t think the differences found in this study are so profound as to require such study,” she said. “Generally speaking, almost 80% of people using any form of contraception were able to conceive within 1 year of trying, which has been the stated fertility data for decades,” she said.

The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Lead author Ms. Yland had no financial conflicts to disclose. Dr. Prager had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Yland JJ et al. BMJ. 2020 Nov 12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3966.

Pages

Recommended Reading

'Cardio-obstetrics' tied to better outcome in pregnancy with CVD
MDedge Family Medicine
New estimates for breast cancer risk with HRT
MDedge Family Medicine
Proposed withdrawal of approval of preterm drug: Two opposing views
MDedge Family Medicine
Primary care workforce expanding, but mostly in cities
MDedge Family Medicine
COVID-19 in pregnancy raises risk of preterm birth and severe disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Medication adherence challenges and helpers
MDedge Family Medicine
Pregnancy can be safe with interstitial lung disease
MDedge Family Medicine
Treatment sequence with romosozumab influences osteoporosis outcomes
MDedge Family Medicine
Denosumab favored over alendronate for BMD protection in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Rare event: Iatrogenic injury during cervical cancer screening
MDedge Family Medicine