From the Journals

Meta-analysis finds much less lupus than expected


 

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY

The prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) appears to be much lower than previously believed and may pose “a potential risk to research funding for the disease,” according to results of a meta-analysis involving a network of population-based registries.

Estimated SLE prevalence by sex, race/ethnicity in 2018

“When we started this study, a widely cited lupus statistic was that approximately 1.5 million Americans were affected. Our meta-analysis found the actual prevalence to be slightly more than 200,000: a number that approaches the [Food and Drug Administration’s] definition of a rare disease,” Emily Somers, PhD, ScM, senior author and associate professor of rheumatology and environmental health sciences at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, said in a written statement.

Their estimates, published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology, put the overall SLE prevalence in the United States at 72.8 per 100,000 person-years in 2018, with nearly nine times more females affected (128.7 cases per 100,000) than males (14.6 per 100,000). Race and ethnicity also play a role, as prevalence was highest among American Indian/Alaska Native and Black females, with Hispanic females lower but still higher than White and Asian/Pacific Islander females, Peter M. Izmirly, MD, MSc, of New York University, the lead author, and associates said.

SLE prevalence was distributed similarly in men, although there was a greater relative margin between American Indians/Alaska Natives (53.8 cases per 100,000 person-years) and Blacks (26.7 per 100,000), and Asians/Pacific Islanders were higher than Whites (11.2 vs. 8.9), the investigators reported.

The meta-analysis leveraged data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s national lupus registries, which include four state-specific SLE registries and a fifth in the Indian Health Service. All cases of SLE occurred in 2002-2009, and the data were age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. population and separately extrapolated to the 2018 U.S. Census population, they explained.

The analysis was funded by cooperative agreements between the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and New York University, and the CDC and National Institute of Health.

Recommended Reading

Methotrexate users need tuberculosis tests in high-TB areas
MDedge Family Medicine
Sjögren’s symptom clusters may identify treatment options
MDedge Family Medicine
Chronic inflammatory diseases vary widely in CHD risk 
MDedge Family Medicine
Slow taper off antimalarial is best to avoid lupus flare during remission
MDedge Family Medicine
High-need, high-cost lupus patients described for first time
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA expands belimumab indication to adults with lupus nephritis
MDedge Family Medicine
High hydroxychloroquine blood level may lower thrombosis risk in lupus
MDedge Family Medicine
Treprostinil offers some benefits for patients with ILD-associated pulmonary hypertension
MDedge Family Medicine
Severe renal arteriosclerosis may indicate cardiovascular risk in lupus nephritis
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA approves voclosporin for lupus nephritis
MDedge Family Medicine