Applied Evidence

Recognizing and treating trigger finger

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Surgical treatments in an office setting

Procedures for TF can be safely performed under conscious sedation or local anesthesia, with or without a tourniquet.26 Wide-awake procedures with local anesthesia and no tourniquet (WALANT) can be performed in an office-based procedure room rather than the operating room. This increases efficiency for the surgeon, reduces the amount of preparation and recovery time for the patient, and helps to keep costs down.

Percutaneous release involves the insertion of a 16-gauge hypodermic needle into the affected A1 pulley. The needle is used to fray and disrupt the pulley by moving the needle tip over the fibrotic A1 pulley.

While NSAIDs are commonly recommended to resolve the local inflammation secondary to triggering, there is no scientific evidence to support their use.

However, it is not without possible complications.27 Inadvertent A2 pulley damage is particularly troublesome, as it leads to “bowstringing” or protrusion of the flexor tendon into the palm upon flexion. This can cause pain and failure to fully extend or flex the finger.10 Because the anatomy is not well visualized during the percutaneous approach, incomplete release, neurovascular injury, and iatrogenic injury to the A2 pulley or deep tendon may occur.28 Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release techniques have shown effective clinical outcomes with minimal complications compared to nonguided percutaneous release techniques.29,30

Open release is the gold standard surgical treatment for trigger finger (FIGURE 3). A small incision (1-2 cm) is made directly over or proximal to the A1 pulley in the distal palmar crease at the base of the affected digit. After blunt dissection through the subcutaneous tissue, the A1 pulley is sharply incised. An open approach has the clear benefit of avoiding the digital neurovascular bundles, as well as visualizing the resolution of triggering upon flexion and extension prior to closure. The WALANT procedure has the advantage of allowing the awake patient to actively flex and extend the digit to determine if the A1 release has been successful prior to closure of the incision.

The A1 pulley release

Outcomes and complications of surgery. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has shown percutaneous techniques to be successful in 94% of cases.27 The success rate of open surgery has been reported at 99% to 100% at varying follow-up intervals up to 1 year.25,30,31 The complication rate for percutaneous release (guided and nonguided) was calculated at 2.2% (n = 2114).27 In another study, the overall complication rate of open releases was calculated at 1% (n = 999).32 When comparing percutaneous release (guided and nonguided) and open release, a meta-analysis found no significant difference in complication rate (RR = 0.84) or failure rate (RR = 0.94).32

Continue to: Several risk factors...

Pages

Recommended Reading

‘Deeper dive’ into opioid overdose deaths during COVID pandemic
MDedge Family Medicine
‘Lopioid protocol’ – low-dose opioids – proposed for fracture surgery
MDedge Family Medicine
Growing proportion of cardiac arrests in U.S. considered opioid related
MDedge Family Medicine
Case: Patient with statin-associated muscle symptoms
MDedge Family Medicine
Most muscle pain on statins not a drug effect: SAMSON in print
MDedge Family Medicine
Assessing headache severity via migraine symptoms can help predict outcomes
MDedge Family Medicine
Opioid overdoses tied to lasting cognitive impairment
MDedge Family Medicine
As opioid deaths climb, human trials begin for vaccine
MDedge Family Medicine
Step-wise medical therapy is cost effective for endometriosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Guideline gives weak support to trying oral medical cannabis for chronic pain
MDedge Family Medicine