From the Journals

Hypertension protocols curb racial bias in therapeutic inertia


 

FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN

Therapeutic inertia still high

In an accompanying commentary, Matthew Rivara, MD, Nisha Bansal, MD, and Bessie Young, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, say the current SPRINT analysis has broad implications for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in achievement of evidence-based treatment targets in the general population.

“In hypertension management, standardized protocols for medication adjustments may limit clinician practice heterogeneity to ultimately reduce differences in blood pressure control among racial and ethnic minority populations,” they write. But they add that such protocols must be implemented thoughtfully to incorporate individualized clinical assessment and clinician-patient shared decision-making.

Dr. Rivara et al. point out that the rates of therapeutic inertia in SPRINT, while lower than community-based estimates, were still very high. They suggest reasons for this could include clinician concerns about medication efficacy, adverse effects, and patient mistrust of medical professionals. Outside the clinical trial environment, additional considerations may include prescription drug and laboratory test costs, pharmacy access, and competing demands during busy clinic visits.

To address these challenges, they say that clinicians need education on current clinical practice guidelines, managing complications of intensified antihypertensive therapies, and shared decisionmaking, including culturally sensitive collaborative care. Similarly, care systems must support patients on how to address concerns about treatments.

Finally, further research is needed to better define the specific factors associated with therapeutic inertia to allow tailored interventions to overcome this inertia.

“In designing and performing such research, it is vital that investigators engage with racial and ethnic minority groups to better explore the intersection of race, ethnicity, therapeutic decision-making, trust, and shared decisionmaking,” they add.

The SPRINT trial was funded with federal funds from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Zheutlin reported receiving grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

BP Track: Blood pressure control rates dropped during pandemic
MDedge Family Medicine
Specific blood pressure-lowering drugs prevent onset of new diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Firefighters’ blood pressure surges when they are called to action
MDedge Family Medicine
Blood pressure control worsened during COVID pandemic
MDedge Family Medicine
Yoga effective adjunct therapy in recurrent vasovagal syncope
MDedge Family Medicine
Benign adrenal tumors linked to hypertension, type 2 diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
New blood test could identify pregnant women who are at risk of preeclampsia
MDedge Family Medicine
Midlife cardiovascular conditions tied to greater cognitive decline in women
MDedge Family Medicine
The child with hypertension: Diagnosis and management
MDedge Family Medicine
AHA advice for diabetes patients to stay heart healthy
MDedge Family Medicine