Applied Evidence

A practical guide to appendicitis evaluation and treatment

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The primary endpoint was the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, with secondary outcomes including appendectomy in the antibiotics group and complications through 90 days. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, sepsis, peritonitis, recurrent appendicitis, severe phlegmon on imaging, or evidence of neoplasm.22

Antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy for the 30-day study. However, antibiotics failed in 29%, who then proceeded to appendectomy by 90 days; these patients also accounted for 41% of those with an appendicolith. Overall complications were more common in the antibiotics group than in the appendectomy group (8.1 vs 3.5 per 100 participants; 95% CI, 1.3-3.98). Also more common in the antibiotic group were serious adverse events (4 vs 3 per 100 participants; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.67-2.50). The presence of an appendicolith in the antibiotics group increased the conversion risk to appendectomy, as well as adverse events risk.22

The takeaway. Antibiotic treatment is a noninferior method to treat acute uncomplicated appendicitis. However, the informed consent process is important, given the ~30% failure rate. Patient factors such as continued access to care should help inform the decision.

Two main surgical approaches exist for appendectomy: open and minimally invasive. At this time, the minimally invasive options include laparoscopic, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and robotic appendectomy. A study comparing cost, availability, or complications of these options has not been conducted at this time.

Antibiotic treatment is a noninferior method to treat acute uncomplicated appendicitis. However, the informed consent process is important, given the ~30% failure rate.

A large Cochrane review of 67 studies examining open vs laparoscopic appendectomy in adults and children completed in 2018 revealed that the laparoscopic approach reduced early postoperative pain intensity and led to a shorter hospital stay, earlier return to work or usual activities, and a decrease in wound infections.23 The odds of IAA occurring with laparoscopic appendectomy increased by 65% compared with an open procedure; however, postoperative bowel obstruction and incisional hernias were less likely to occur.23 Additionally, following laparoscopic surgery, postoperative bowel obstruction and incisional hernias are less likely to occur. The laparoscopic approach is preferred due to overall increased patient satisfaction and a reduction in most, if not all, complications.

Continue to: Complicated appendicitis

Pages

Recommended Reading

Olive oil intake tied to reduced mortality
MDedge Family Medicine
Much lower risk of false-positive breast screen in Norway versus U.S.
MDedge Family Medicine
Docs react: Crowd crush survival guide, more dewormer, sizzling earwax
MDedge Family Medicine
More vitamin D not better for reducing cancer or CVD incidence
MDedge Family Medicine
AI holds its own against pathologists for prostate cancer diagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Cervical cancer screening rates on the decline in the U.S.
MDedge Family Medicine
Program targets preschoolers to promote heart health
MDedge Family Medicine
ACP advocates outpatient treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis
MDedge Family Medicine
Breastfeeding linked to lower CVD risk in later life
MDedge Family Medicine
How to identify balance disorders and reduce fall risk
MDedge Family Medicine