News

Medicare Tests Chronic Care Management Fee : Projects seek to strengthen the relationship between chronically ill patients and their doctors.


 

Financial incentives and technology support for physicians are two “carrots” Medicare is testing to help improve chronic disease care for its beneficiaries.

Primary care groups are collaborating with health care contractors to test a model of care that supports the physician's role in managing chronic disease.

The voluntary Medicare Chronic Care Improvement Program, a demonstration project created as part of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, is expected to reach approximately 180,000 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic health conditions.

Not all the details have been worked out, but the American College of Physicians and other primary groups plan to work with two health care contractors “to find out how these models will work in the context of the project,” Robert Doherty, ACP's senior vice president for governmental affairs and public policy, said in an interview.

Developed by Edward H. Wagner, M.D., an internist and epidemiologist, the chronic care model features an evidence-based team approach and physician incentives for improved care. It also emphasizes information technology and online, real-time clinical decision support.

Health Dialog Services Corp. will run the project in Pennsylvania, and McKesson Health Solutions was awarded a contract in Mississippi. Those companies were the only two that proposed the physician-guided, patient-centered model of care in their bids to Medicare, Mr. Doherty said.

Three physician groups—the ACP, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American Geriatrics Society—will collaborate with McKesson on its project. McKesson “is doing all the ground work on the project, but all three physician groups will serve as subcontractors,” Mary Frank, M.D., AAFP president, told FAMILY PRACTICE NEWS.

Sandeep Wadhwa, M.D., vice president of government programs at McKesson, said the company “wanted to test a model that supports and enables the physician's care plan and strengthens the relationship between chronically ill patients and their doctors.”

The McKesson test includes a chronic care management fee to recognize the time and effort involved in this initiative, Dr. Wadhwa said in an interview. “We are also placing additional community- and office-based support” to improve adherence to physicians' treatment plans,” he said. The project is expected to begin in June or September.

That CMS awarded the contracts is a sign the agency was willing to look at the model's effectiveness, Mr. Doherty said.

Testing only parts of it, however, “won't give the model the full evaluation that's ultimately needed,” he added. For that reason, the ACP plans to submit a white paper to Congress, outlining a more ambitious request to test the model in its entirety in a separate demonstration project.

Most bidders in Medicare's chronic care demonstration project are large health care organizations. “We believe there should be a larger demonstration, to take the full components developed by Dr. Wagner” and test their effectiveness in smaller physician practices, Mr. Doherty said.

The ACP will be submitting the model along with a series of proposals that address broader payment issues for physicians. “Our sense is, we may need additional authority to test the model—that Congress should enact legislation to allow CMS to launch another demonstration project to allow full evaluation of the model,” Mr. Doherty said.

The AAFP in the meantime has decided not to wait for the Medicare project's outcome to begin using Dr. Wagner's model in physician practices.

“The academy decided a year ago that we would teach Dr. Wagner's model to our members through continuing medical education and lectures,” Dr. Frank said. The AAFP is in the process of finalizing an educational tool kit to help physicians integrate the model into practice.

Management of chronic disease is just one element of the AAFP's new model of family medicine and part of its Future of Family Medicine project, Dr. Frank explained. Ultimately, the goal is to integrate patients into this model of care, so they can enhance their role as part of the care team, she said.

Primary Care = Chronic Care

Primary care doctors have not been proactive in ensuring regular interactions with their chronically ill patients, according to Dr. Wagner.

At a health policy conference last November, he asserted that the care of the chronically ill “is not planned, and it's dependent on the doctor, the doctor's memory, and disorganized written records.”

Management of these patients usually relies on symptoms and lab results—not longer-term disease control and prevention. “Most patients are receiving rushed admonitions to shape up, not counseling and supportive interventions that work,” said Dr. Wagner, who directs Improving Chronic Illness Care (ICIC), a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Task Force Raises Safety, Cost Concerns on Drug Importation
MDedge Family Medicine
Policy & Practice
MDedge Family Medicine
Data Watch
MDedge Family Medicine
Consumer Reports Rates Drug Cost Effectiveness
MDedge Family Medicine
Doctors Brace for Lawsuits Over Undertreatment of Pain
MDedge Family Medicine
Insurance Not a Barrier for Most Patients in ED
MDedge Family Medicine
Program Aims to Treat Disruptive Physicians
MDedge Family Medicine
Does Medicaid Managed Care Deliver Savings?
MDedge Family Medicine
Office Staff Try Patient E-Mail Contact and Like It
MDedge Family Medicine
Broadening Friendships Beyond Medicine
MDedge Family Medicine