News

ACOG Criticized for Restricting Rural VBACs


 

NEW ORLEANS — Neonatal and maternal mortality in California did not significantly change after the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that vaginal births be attempted after cesarean delivery only in settings with “immediately available” emergency care, according to one study.

John Zweifler, M.D., and research fellow Susan Hughes compared neonatal and maternal deaths from 1996 to 2002, before and after the 1999 recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. They reviewed maternal demographics, birth data, and outcomes, noting previous cesarean sections and whether hospitals were in rural or urban areas.

Very low-birth-weight infants were the only group in the study to experience significantly higher mortality associated with vaginal births after cesarean (VBAC).

When ACOG was contacted for comment, a representative, Gary Hankins, M.D., criticized the study design and its implications.

In 1996, ACOG encouraged VBACs, Dr. Zweifler said at the annual conference of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. In 1998, the college changed its recommendations on VBACs and stated they should be attempted only where emergency care is “readily available.”

The following year, ACOG further restricted the recommendations to settings where emergency care is “immediately available.” The college retained the wording of these recommendations in its latest update (Obstet. Gynecol. 2004;104:203–12).

ACOG defines “immediately available” as having access to anesthesia services and a physician throughout active labor, as well as the resources to perform an emergency cesarean. “But for those of us in rural settings, this could impair our ability to do VBAC,” Dr. Zweifler said. “We were concerned that a change in ACOG guidelines would have deleterious effects on our [residency] program.”

California Birth Statistical Master files consider mortality to be associated with birth if it occurs within 72 hours of delivery, explained Dr. Zweifler, program director of the University of California, San Francisco, family medicine residency program, in Fresno.

There were more than 3.5 million single births in California from 1996 to 2002, including 2.7 million vaginal births, 456,000 primary cesarean sections, and 386,000 births by women with a history of cesarean section. Of the women with a history of cesarean delivery, 312,000 had a repeat cesarean, and 74,000 had an attempted VBAC. There were 61,000 successful VBACs and 13,000 failed ones.

VBAC rates decreased from 1996 to 2002, reflecting national trends, Ms. Hughes said. The biggest drop was in rural VBACs.

The study found that “there were very few maternal deaths, about 35. So statistically, there were no differences in maternal mortality between time periods or attempted VBAC, versus repeat cesareans,” Ms. Hughes said. There was a statistically significant increase in mortality for infants weighing less than 1,500 g.

“Attempted VBACs in both time periods had higher death rates than repeat cesareans,” Ms. Hughes added.

However, there were no significant differences in mortality for infants born heavier than 1,500 g, including those heavier than 4,000 g. “You might expect to see [VBAC] complications in the large birth weight group, but we did not see a higher rate,” he said.

Reliability of birth certificate data was a possible limitation of the study, Ms. Hughes said. In addition, there was no information on morbidities, such as uterine rupture or newborn encephalopathy.

“The more restrictive ACOG guidelines have not improved VBAC-related neonatal or maternal mortality,” Dr. Zweifler said. “We feel [that] with previous cesarean, we can expect similar outcomes with either a VBAC or C-section with a normal- or large-birth-weight baby.”

“ACOG's recommendation is purely based on the fact there is no more catastrophic event that befalls women than uterine rupture,” said Dr. Hankins, chair of the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice.

“Studies clearly show that if you are not really available to respond to this emergency in a very quick fashion—generally less than 30 minutes—you can expect, in a significant number of cases, either the death of the baby or permanent neurologic injury of the baby from birth asphyxia, said Dr. Hankins, professor in the ob.gyn. department at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

Recommended Reading

Mild Postpartum Depression: Try Nondrug Options
MDedge Family Medicine
3-D Ultrasound Visualizes Even Minor Fetal Defects
MDedge Family Medicine
Switching Patients From Valproate May Reverse Hormonal PCOS
MDedge Family Medicine
Clinical Capsules
MDedge Family Medicine
Atypical Antipsychotics
MDedge Family Medicine
USPSTF Issues Hormone Tx Recommendations
MDedge Family Medicine
Review Links HT to Higher Stroke Risk
MDedge Family Medicine
Guideline: Use Aromatase Inhibitor as Adjuvant
MDedge Family Medicine
Newer Radiotherapy Curbs Local Breast Cancer Recurrences
MDedge Family Medicine
Cryoablation Is Option In Breast Fibroadenomas
MDedge Family Medicine