Which patients might benefit from platelet-rich plasma?

,; ,; ,

doi:doi: 10.12788/jfp.0607

Applied Evidence

Which patients might benefit from platelet-rich plasma?

J Fam Pract. 2023 June;72(5):192-199 | doi: 10.12788/jfp.0607

PDF Download

References

1. Cecerska-Heryć E, Goszka M, Serwin N, et al. Applications of the regenerative capacity of platelets in modern medicine. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;64:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.11.003

2. Le ADK, Enweze L, DeBaun MR, et al. Current clinical recommendations for use of platelet-rich plasma. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:624-634. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9527-7

3. Everts P, Onishi K, Jayaram P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: new performance understandings and therapeutic considerations in 2020. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7794. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207794

4. Di Martino A, Boffa A, Andriolo L, et al. Leukocyte-rich versus leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50:609-617. doi: 10.1177/03635465211064303

5. Mariani E, Pulsatelli L. Platelet concentrates in musculoskeletal medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1328. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041328

6. Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Houck DA, et al. Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:249-260. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909397

7. Filardo G, Kon E, Della Villa S, et al. Use of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of refractory jumper’s knee. Int Orthop. 2010;34:909-915. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0845-7

8. Kon E, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: new clinical application: a pilot study for treatment of jumper’s knee. Injury. 2009;40:598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.11.026

9. Kanchanatawan W, Arirachakaran A, Chaijenkij K, et al. Short-term outcomes of platelet-rich plasma injection for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:1665-1677. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3784-4

10. Cook J, Young M. Biologic therapies for tendon and muscle injury. UpToDate. Updated August 11, 2022. Accessed May 23, 2023. www.uptodate.com/contents/biologic-therapies-for-tendon-and-muscle-injury

11. Bendich I, Rubenstein WJ, Cole BJ, et al. What is the appropriate price for platelet-rich plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis? A cost-effectiveness analysis based on evidence from Level I randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:1983-1991.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.004

12. Jones IA, Togashi RC, Thomas Vangsness C Jr. The economics and regulation of PRP in the evolving field of orthopedic biologics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:558-565. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9514-z

13. Costa LAV, Lenza M, Irrgang JJ, et al. How does platelet-rich plasma compare clinically to other therapies in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51:1074-1086 doi: 10.1177/03635465211062243

14. Meheux CJ, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, et al. Efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.005

15. Shen L, Yuan T, Chen S, et al. The temporal effect of platelet-rich plasma on pain and physical function in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:16. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0521-3

16. Paget LDA, Reurink G, de Vos RJ, et al; PRIMA Study Group. Effect of platelet-rich plasma injections vs. placebo on ankle symptoms and function in patients with ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326:1595-1605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16602

17. Evans A, Ibrahim M, Pope R, et al. Treating hand and foot osteoarthritis using a patient’s own blood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of platelet-rich plasma. J Orthop. 2020;18:226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.037

18. Ye Y, Zhou X, Mao S, et al. Platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2018;53:279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.078.

19. Berney M, McCarroll P, Glynn L, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injections for hip osteoarthritis: a review of the evidence. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190:1021-1025. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02388-z

20. Belk JW, Houck DA, Littlefield CP, et al. Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis yields similarly beneficial short-term clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I and II randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2022;38:2035-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.005

21. Dadgostar H, Fahimipour F, Pahlevan Sabagh A, et al. Corticosteroids or platelet-rich plasma injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:333. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02470-x

22. Kwong CA, Woodmass JM, Gusnowski EM, et al. Platelet-rich plasma in patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears or tendinopathy leads to significantly improved short-term pain relief and function compared with corticosteroid injection: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2021;37:510-517. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.037

23. A Hamid MS, Sazlina SG. Platelet-rich plasma for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0251111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251111

24. Lian OB, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevalence of jumper’s knee among elite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:561-567. doi: 10.1177/0363546504270454

25. Dragoo JL, Wasterlain AS, Braun HJ, et al. Platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for patellar tendinopathy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:610-618. doi: 10.1177/0363546513518416.

26. Rodas G, Soler-Rich R, Rius-Tarruella J, et al. Effect of autologous expanded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells or leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma in chronic patellar tendinopathy (with gap >3 mm): preliminary outcomes after 6 months of a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:1492-1504. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998725

27. Andriolo L, Altamura SA, Reale D, et al. Nonsurgical treatments of patellar tendinopathy: multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma are a suitable option: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:1001-1018. doi: 10.1177/0363546518759674

28. Scott A, LaPrade RF, Harmon KG, et al. Platelet-rich plasma for patellar tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial of leukocyte-rich PRP or leukocyte-poor PRP versus saline. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:1654-1661. doi: 10.1177/0363546519837954

29. Kemp JA, Olson MA, Tao MA, et al. Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16:597-605. doi: 10.26603/001c.24148

30. Miller LE, Parrish WR, Roides B, et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections for symptomatic tendinopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised injection-controlled trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3:e000237. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017- 000237

31. Ben-Nafa W, Munro W. The effect of corticosteroid versus platelet-rich plasma injection therapies for the management of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. SICOT J. 2018;4:11. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017062

32. Niemiec P, Szyluk K, Jarosz A, et al. Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on achievement of minimal clinically important difference. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10:23259671221086920. doi: 10.1177/23259671221086920

33. Li S, Yang G, Zhang H, et al. A systematic review on the efficacy of different types of platelet-rich plasma in the management of lateral epicondylitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;311533-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.017.

34. Madhi MI, Yausep OE, Khamdan K, et al. The use of PRP in treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review of literature. Study design: systematic review of literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;55:320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.042

35. Loppini M, Maffulli N. Conservative management of tendinopathy: an evidence-based approach. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;1:134-137.

36. Nauwelaers AK, Van Oost L, Peers K. Evidence for the use of PRP in chronic midsubstance Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27:486-495. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.07.009

37. Dai WL, Zhou AG, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:659-670.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.024

38. Bar-Or D, Rael LT, Brody EN. Use of saline as a placebo in intra-articular injections in osteoarthritis: potential contributions to nociceptive pain relief. Open Rheumatol J. 2017;11:16-22. doi: 10.2174/1874312901711010016

39. Phillips M, Bhandari M, Grant J, et al. A systematic review of current clinical practice guidelines on intra-articular hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, and platelet-rich plasma injection for knee osteoarthritis: an international perspective. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211030272. doi: 10.1177/23259671211030272

40. Finnoff JT, Awan TM, Borg-Stein J, et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: principles for the responsible use of regenerative medicine in sports medicine. Clin J Sport Med. 2021;31:530-541. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000973

Rotator cuff tendinopathy

❯ ❯ ❯ Consider PRP for short-term pain relief

Painful conditions of the rotator cuff include impingement syndrome, tendonitis, and partial and complete tears. A 2021 RCT (N = 58) by Dadgostar et al²¹ comparing PRP injection to corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone and lidocaine) for the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy showed significant improvement in VAS scores at 3 months in the PRP group compared to the corticosteroid group (6.66 ± 2.26 to 3.08 ± 2.14 vs 5.53 ± 1.80 to 3.88 ± 1.99, respectively; P = .023). There also were more significant improvements in adduction in the PRP group compared to the corticosteroid group (20.50° ± 8.23° to 28° ± 3.61° vs 23.21° ± 7.09° to 28.46° ± 4.18°, respectively; P = .011), and external rotation (59.66° ± 23.81° to 76.66° ± 18.30° vs 57.14°± 24.69° to 65.57° ± 26.39° for the PRP and corticosteroid groups, respectively; P = .036).²¹

Another RCT (N = 99) by Kwong et al²² comparing PRP to corticosteroids found similar short-term advantages of LP-PRP with an improved VAS score (–13.6 vs 0.4; P = .03), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (13.0 vs 2.9; P = .02), and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index score (16.8 vs 5.8; P = .03).However, there was no long-term benefit of PRP over corticosteroids found at 12 months.²²

A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis by Hamid et al²³ that included 8 RCTs (N = 976) favored PRP over control (no injection, saline injections, and/or shoulder rehabilitation) with improved VAS scores at 12 months (SMD = –0.5; 95% CI, –0.7 to –0.2; P < .001).The evidence on functional outcome was mixed. Data pooled from 2 studies (n = 228) found better Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores compared to controls at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. However, there were no significant differences in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores between the 2 groups.²³

Patellar tendinopathy

❯ ❯ ❯ Consider using PRP for return to sport

Patellar tendinopathy, a common MSK condition encountered in the primary care setting, has an overall prevalence of 22% in elite athletes at some point in their career.²⁴Nonsurgical management options include rest, ice, eccentric and isometric exercises, anti-inflammatory drugs, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and dry needling (DN).

Currently, corticosteroid injections are the only intraarticular therapy recommended by international guidelines for hip OA.

A 2014 RCT (N = 23) evaluating DN vs PRP for patellar tendinopathy favored PRP with improved VAS scores (mean ± SD = 25.4 ± 23.2 points; P = .01 vs 5.2 ± 12.5 points; P = .20) at 12 weeks (P = .02). However, at ≥ 26 weeks, the improvement in pain and function scores was similar between the DN and PRP groups (33.2 ± 14.0 points; P = .001 vs 28.9 ± 25.2 points; P = .01). Notably, there was significantly more improvement in the PRP group at 12 weeks (P = .02) but not at 26 weeks (P = .66).²⁵

Continue to: Another perspective study...