News

Anemia Tied to Worse AcuteCoronary Syndrome Outcomes


 

VIENNA — Anemia was a significant risk factor for worse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in a post hoc analysis of almost 14,000 patients enrolled in a recent trial.

Despite this evidence of anemia's risk, it's premature to conclude that treating anemia—either with blood transfusions or with erythropoietin—is the best way to reduce the risk, Dr. Roxana Mehran said at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.

“We believe that anemia is another risk factor, like age or diabetes, but there may be confounders when you find anemia in ACS [acute coronary syndrome] patients, so it's hard to tease out,” said Dr. Mehran, director of outcomes research at the center for interventional vascular therapy at Columbia University, New York.

The effects of anemia in ACS were studied using data collected on 13,819 patients with either unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. The primary end point of the study showed that benefit and risk from treatment with the antithrombotic drug bivalirudin (Angiomax) alone was similar to standard treatment with a heparin (either unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin) plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or to treatment with bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;355:2203–16).

The trial was sponsored by the Medicines Co., which markets Angiomax. Dr. Mehran is a speaker for and had received honoraria from the Medicines Co.

Anemia information at baseline was available for about 94% of patients, including 10,839 without anemia and 2,200 with anemia. The primary end point in the ACUITY trial was a composite risk and benefit measure for the first 30 days after treatment that added the total number of deaths, myocardial infarctions, unplanned revascularization procedures, and major bleeding events. For the patients with anemia, the rate was 16.2%, compared with a 10.2% rate in the nonanemic patients, a statistically significant difference, said Dr. Mehran. Anemia was linked with significantly worse outcomes for each of these outcome measures, except for the rate of unplanned revascularization. (See box.) The worse outcomes of patients with anemia were also seen uniformly regardless of how the ACS patients were managed.

ELSEVIER GLOBAL MEDICAL NEWS

Recommended Reading

Metabolic Syndrome Tied to Mortality After CABG
MDedge Family Medicine
Benefits of Low-Dose Aspirin Alone Offset Costs
MDedge Family Medicine
Cardiac Catheterization A Must in PAH Diagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Benefit of Revascularization in Women Questioned
MDedge Family Medicine
Silent Heart Ischemia Appears Reversible in Type 2 Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Normal Angiogram No Reason to Let Guard Down
MDedge Family Medicine
Thrombolysis For DVT Ups Risk of Death
MDedge Family Medicine
Bosentan Slows Progression of Class II PAH
MDedge Family Medicine
High Blood Pressure Rates Rise in Children, Teens
MDedge Family Medicine
Adiposity Labeled a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke
MDedge Family Medicine