News

'J Curve' Persists Despite Intensive Lipid Control


 

SAN FRANCISCO — Bringing blood pressure levels too far down increased the risk for cardiovascular events in a post hoc analysis of data on 10,001 patients with coronary artery disease in a trial of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy.

There has been some controversy around the idea of a “J-curve” relationship between blood pressure and the risk for cardiovascular events, in which a higher rate of events is seen with very low and very high blood pressure levels. Every previous study, except one that looked for this phenomenon, found evidence of a J curve, but it's been unclear whether the J curve exists when other cardiovascular risk factors such as LDL cholesterol levels are managed aggressively, Dr. Franz H. Messerli said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hypertension.

Data for the current analysis came from the double-blind Treating to New Targets trial that randomized patients aged 35-75 years with LDL cholesterol levels below 130 mg/dL to daily cholesterol-lowering therapy with 10 or 80 mg of atorvastatin. That study found significantly reduced cardiovascular risk when LDL levels were reduced to 100 mg/dL.

The post hoc analysis revealed a J curve for blood pressure. Patients who had blood pressures below or above 130-140 mm Hg systolic or 70-80 mm Hg diastolic were at higher risk for the primary end point, a composite of death from coronary disease, nonfatal MI, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke.

The nadirs for safe low blood pressures were 141 mm Hg systolic and 80 mm Hg diastolic, said Dr. Messerli, director of the hypertension program at St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York. He reported the findings in a poster presentation. The lead investigator in the study was Dr. Sripal Bangalore of Harvard Medical School, Boston.

“The good news is that it is a relatively shallow curve,” with mild increases in risk just below those blood pressure nadirs, Dr. Messerli said. Once blood pressure drops to 110 mm Hg systolic or 60 mm Hg diastolic or lower, however, risk for the primary cardiovascular end point tripled.

Similar J-curve relationships were found for secondary end points analyzed individually—all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal MI, or stroke.

Systolic blood pressure was a stronger predictor of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. Diastolic blood pressure was a stronger predictor of nonfatal MI. Systolic and diastolic pressures equally predicted the risk for stroke.

All patients in the study had coronary artery disease. The J-curve phenomenon probably exists for patients without coronary artery disease but “to a much lesser extent,” Dr. Messerli speculated.

The study was funded by Pfizer Inc., which markets atorvastatin. Dr. Messerli has been a consultant, adviser, or speaker for other companies that make antihypertensives, lipid-lowering drugs, or other medications, but has no relationship with Pfizer.

Once blood pressure drops to 110 mm Hg systolic or 60 mm Hg diastolic or lower, the risk tripled.

Source DR. MESSERLI

Recommended Reading

CV Disease/Colorectal Ca Connection Being Missed
MDedge Family Medicine
Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stents Is Higher in Diabetics
MDedge Family Medicine
Analysis Backs Benazepril-Amlodipine Combo
MDedge Family Medicine
Trial Quantifies Exercise Benefits in Heart Failure
MDedge Family Medicine
Large Athletes Not at Elevated Cardiac Risk
MDedge Family Medicine
Hypertrophy Resolves by Getting BP to Goal
MDedge Family Medicine
Watch for Depression in Hypertensive Patients
MDedge Family Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Can Triple Dementia Risk Before Age 70
MDedge Family Medicine
80-Lead ECG System May Improve Diagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
What to do when warfarin therapy goes too far
MDedge Family Medicine