News

States Look Inward as Health Tabs Grow; Tax Revenues Fall


 

WASHINGTON — With health care expenses accounting for the single largest expense in their budget, states are increasingly looking for solutions from within, not from the federal government, according to an annual accounting of state legislative trends compiled by the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.

“Health care spending represented nearly one-third of total state expenditures last fiscal year,” said Susan Laudicina, BCBSA director for state research and policy at a briefing for reporters. As the economy weakens, health care costs will continue to rise, while tax revenues will fall. That will add to the pressure to find creative solutions, she said.

The most significant trend observed in the states: an attempt to expand coverage. About half of the state legislatures debated universal coverage or expansion programs for children in fiscal 2007. State mandates requiring individuals to buy insurance were introduced in 12 states. All of those failed, largely because they are controversial, said Ms. Laudicina.

Connecticut and New York expanded eligibility for SCHIP to 400% of the federal poverty level and seven other states raised eligibility to 300%, but those efforts are threatened by a rule change issued by the Department of Health and Human Services last August that ostensibly caps eligibility at 250% of the federal poverty level. Eight states have sued to challenge that ruling.

Eight states—Connecticut, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, New York, Texas and Washington—created programs in which public funds are used to subsidize the cost of private employer-sponsored health insurance to Medicaid-eligible workers. Oklahoma expanded its existing subsidy program, making more people eligible.

So-called “transparency” initiatives are gaining ground, also. These are proposals that require hospitals—and in some cases, physicians—to publicly share information on infections and other adverse events, and also other quality data and pricing. Twenty-one states debated proposals that would require transparency on some level. Transparency bills were enacted in 10 states: Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington. Eleven states will take up transparency measures in 2008, she said.

Recommended Reading

Policy & Practice
MDedge Family Medicine
CMS to Cut Reimbursement For Fast In-Office HbA1c Test
MDedge Family Medicine
Community Project Targets Heart Health in West Virginia
MDedge Family Medicine
Financial Assistance Available for High-Cost Cancer Therapies
MDedge Family Medicine
NYC Hospital Group to Advertise Error Rates : The strategy: If mortality and infection data are made public, then areas for improvement can be identified.
MDedge Family Medicine
Sedation Coverage for GI Procedures Scrutinized : Aetna's policy, some worry, would restrict physician choice and reduce colon cancer screening rates.
MDedge Family Medicine
Policy & Practice
MDedge Family Medicine
The Inspiring Journey of a Multiple Amputee
MDedge Family Medicine
Aetna to Refuse Payment for Some Preventable Inpatient Errors
MDedge Family Medicine
Indications
MDedge Family Medicine