News

Insurers Fail to Uphold Their End on Billing Agreements


 

LAS VEGAS — Large insurers will return to inappropriate billing practices as class action suit agreements expire, according to a compliance expert.

In fact, many companies have been accused of violating the terms already, said Edward R. Gaines III, vice president and chief compliance officer for Healthcare Business Resources in Durham, N.C., who spoke at a meeting on reimbursement sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians.

Mr. Gaines said that noncompliance among all the plans that have settled has continued to be an issue, which is being dealt with in the courts and administratively. But, “the problem is, once the settlement agreement expires, I can't go back into federal court through an easy process to make my complaint heard,” he said.

The settlements were struck in response to Multidistrict Litigation 1334, which was certified as a class action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in 2002 and named Aetna Inc., Anthem Insurance Cos. Inc., Cigna, Coventry Health Care Inc., Health Net Inc., Humana Inc., PacifiCare Health Systems Inc., Prudential Insurance Co. of America, United Health Care, and WellPoint Health Networks Inc. as defendants. The suits alleged that the insurers violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by engaging in fraud and extortion in a common scheme to wrongfully deny payment to physicians.

Several state and county medical societies filed the suits on behalf of virtually every physician in the nation—about 900,000 doctors.

United Health Care and Coventry both were summarily released from the litigation. Their release has been upheld on appeal.

Aetna and Cigna struck agreements that entailed an immediate payout in response to claims filed by physicians, some changes in billing behavior, and an agreement to provide prospective relief—$300 million from Aetna and $400 million from Cigna.

Cigna's 4-year agreement has now expired, and Aetna's 4-year agreement expired in June 2007; but Aetna's agreement was extended through June 2008 because of compliance disputes. After an investigation, the New Jersey insurance department fined Aetna $9.5 million in June 2007 for failing to properly pay for out-of-network providers. The insurer is paying nonparticipating physicians only 125% of Medicare rates and informing patients that they are not responsible for the difference.

Mr. Gaines urged physicians to hold the health plans that settled accountable to their agreements. Information on settlement terms and how to dispute claims can be found at www.hmosettlements.com

Recommended Reading

Policy & Practice
MDedge Family Medicine
CMS to Cut Reimbursement For Fast In-Office HbA1c Test
MDedge Family Medicine
Community Project Targets Heart Health in West Virginia
MDedge Family Medicine
Financial Assistance Available for High-Cost Cancer Therapies
MDedge Family Medicine
NYC Hospital Group to Advertise Error Rates : The strategy: If mortality and infection data are made public, then areas for improvement can be identified.
MDedge Family Medicine
Sedation Coverage for GI Procedures Scrutinized : Aetna's policy, some worry, would restrict physician choice and reduce colon cancer screening rates.
MDedge Family Medicine
Policy & Practice
MDedge Family Medicine
The Inspiring Journey of a Multiple Amputee
MDedge Family Medicine
Aetna to Refuse Payment for Some Preventable Inpatient Errors
MDedge Family Medicine
Indications
MDedge Family Medicine