News

NIMH Brain Researchers: Some Children Outgrow ADHD


 

SANTA FE, N.M. — Twenty years of brain imaging studies in children are leading National Institute of Mental Health investigators to explore whether they can distinguish youngsters who will outgrow attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from those for whom it will be a persistent problem.

This new work is built on evidence that normal brain development occurs with a 3-year delay in children with ADHD. In pilot data, the researchers have found a hint that the brains of youngsters who have “good” clinical outcomes compensate for this delay, whereas those of youngsters with “poor” outcomes take a different developmental trajectory.

“Approximately half of them grow up, and follow what their grandmothers said all along: 'He will grow out of it,'” Dr. Judith L. Rapoport, chief of the Child Psychiatry Branch at the NIMH, told attendees at an annual psychiatric symposium sponsored by the University of Arizona.

Her group has accumulated more than 6,000 anatomic MRIs of children whose brains were scanned every 2 years starting at age 4 in a longitudinal study, she said. The subjects were not selected for any particular psychiatric condition, but 300 were subsequently diagnosed with ADHD. In addition, the investigators received 3,000 referrals of children with suspected childhood-onset schizophrenia, among whom it found and scanned 107 children with the rare disorder.

By mapping the normal course of cortical development, the study revealed a process of cortical thinning from ages 5 to 20 that can be seen in Dr. Rapoport's words as “a back-to-front wave of cortical maturation” (PNAS 2004;101:8174-9; Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2:861-3). Comparison of high-intelligence children with those of high and average intelligence subsequently showed the children with high IQs had a developmental trajectory in which key measures were reached 2-3 years later than in the other children.

“We were simply astonished to find out the real difference was between the superior intelligence group and the rest, and it was in the frontal lobes,” Dr. Rapoport recalled, adding that this is “one example that later at least in some brain regions is not associated with deficit and may be associated with the opposite.”

Subsequent work showed later cortical development in the brains of children with ADHD (PNAS 2007;104:19649-54), and that the trajectory of baseline thinning also differed in ADHD between children with better outcomes and those with poor outcomes. Among the findings were that brain asymmetry is not as pronounced in ADHD as in normal children and that the right parietal cortex—a little region that “looks like a freckle”—develops differently in ADHD.

One study showed that cortical thickness “normalizes” in the right parietal cortex of 48 children with ADHD who have “good” outcomes. The difference at a key point in the developmental trajectory was statistically significant when these children were compared with 51 children with poor outcomes and to 161 healthy children without ADHD. The finding “suggests compensatory plastic response for good-outcome subjects,” Dr. Rapoport said of the ongoing study.

Further work suggests that some children with ADHD reach a developmental milestone by their adolescent years, but others do not. She cautioned that her group has not published what it considers “just pilot data” in this regard, but has started to follow 80 hyperactive 5-year-olds in the hope of developing a predictive test based on brain development trajectories that will distinguish the children who are going to outgrow ADHD from “those who are going to continue to have problems.”

The study should produce results in about 5 years, Dr. Rapoport said, forecasting that such a test might help clinicians “single out people for whom resources are really needed, and let us relax more for people for whom, no matter what you do, it is going to turn out fine.”

Treating ADHD with stimulants remains controversial, and there is not good evidence supporting benefit from long-term use, she noted. Her group has found no difference in brain development trajectories when children on stimulants are compared with children not treated with stimulants, she said. That said, she suggested, “Kids' memories of grade school are happier [when given stimulants], because they weren't at odds with everyone all the time.”

For now, Dr. Rapoport strongly discourages parents from spending money on brain imaging tests to diagnose ADHD. While useful for research, the tests currently available are unlikely to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity “that you would want anyone to pay for,” she said.

Predicting Schizophrenia in the Womb

Prenatal screening based on variations in the numbers of certain key genes might be able to identify the carriers of childhood-onset schizo-phrenia and other psychiatric disorders, according to Dr. Rapoport.

Pages

Recommended Reading

'Family-Focused' Depression Care Recommended
MDedge Family Medicine
Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression Down Since 2003
MDedge Family Medicine
Data on ADHD Stimulants Deemed Not 'Threatening'
MDedge Family Medicine
Panel Majority Backs Olanzapine for Teen Use
MDedge Family Medicine
Panel Supports Quetiapine for Pediatric Use
MDedge Family Medicine
Web-Based Therapy Improved Insomnia
MDedge Family Medicine
Amino Acid May Be Effective for Trichotillomania
MDedge Family Medicine
Suicide History Can Reveal Bipolar Disorder
MDedge Family Medicine
Teen ADHD Stimulant Abuse Rose 76% in 8 Years
MDedge Family Medicine
Project Offers Psychotherapy to Military Families
MDedge Family Medicine