News

Bisphosphonates May Not Raise Fracture Risk


 

The risk of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures is not significantly increased in women taking bisphosphonates, even among those treated for up to 10 years, a secondary analysis of data from three large randomized bisphosphonate trials suggests.

The findings follow several case reports that hinted at an increased risk of these atypical fractures in bisphosphonate users. However, the current study, which included a review of 283 hip or femur fractures in 14,195 women with 51,287 patient-years of follow-up showed that only 12 subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fractures occurred in 10 women, for a rate of 2.3 per 10,000 patient-years, Dennis M. Black, Ph.D., of the University of California at San Francisco and his colleagues wrote.

The data analyzed in the current study were from the phase III Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), the FIT Long-Term Extension (FLEX) trial, and the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT); the relative hazard ratios for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures were 1.03 for alendronate vs. placebo in FIT, 1.50 for zoledronic acid vs. placebo in HORIZON-PFT, and 1.33 for continued alendronate use vs. placebo in the FLEX trial, the investigators reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010 March 24 [doi10.1056/NEJMoa1001086

Even in the FLEX trial, which included up to 10 years of treatment with alendronate, the risk of femur fracture and atypical femur fracture was very low, with no significantly increased risk of fracture among those who continued treatment for the full 10 years and those who discontinued treatment, they wrote.

Since radiographs in those with fractures were generally not available, atypical features could not be assessed; if this information were available, it is likely the femoral fracture rate would be even lower, they said.

The findings support those from population-based studies, including one that found evidence of an increased incidence of hip and femur fractures with alendronate use, but which attributed that to increased use of alendronate in high-risk patients rather than to use of alendronate.

“Although we can confidently conclude that absolute rates of such fractures are low, wide confidence intervals (resulting from the very low incidence of events) preclude definitive conclusions regarding the relative risk of treatment,” the investigators wrote.

However, based on data they analyzed, the investigators estimated that 3 years of bisphosphonate treatment in 1,000 women with osteoporosis would prevent about 100 fractures, including 71 vertebral fractures and 29 nonvertebral fractures—including 11 hip fractures. Balanced against the annual rate of 2.3 subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures seen in the three trials, “the hypothetical risk is quite small,” they concluded

Additional research is needed to more fully address bisphosphonate use and the risk of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures, Dr. Elizabeth Shane wrote in an accompanying editorial.

While the current findings provide assurance that these types of fractures are extremely rare, and that many more common and equally devastating hip fractures are prevented than are caused by bisphosphonates, physicians should “reevaluate patients who are receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy in the context of contemporary guidelines for treatment initiation, progress while receiving therapy, current bone mineral density measurement, and risk factors for fracture,” wrote Dr. Shane of Columbia University, New York (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010 March 24 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1003064

It is reasonable to consider drug holidays, particularly in those with substantially reduced levels of bone turnover markers, but again, the evidence of persistent antifracture efficacy after discontinuation must be balanced with data showing that 10 vs. 5 years of alendronate use is associated with significantly fewer new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in those with bone mineral density T scores of −2.5 or lower, she wrote.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Merck and Novartis. The investigators reported receiving grants, travel reimbursement, consulting fees, and lecture fees from Merck, Novartis, and several other pharmaceutical manufacturers, as well as the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Dr. Shane reported receiving grants from Novartis, Merck, and other pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Recommended Reading

New Data Challenge 130 mm Hg As Systolic BP Target in Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Closed-Loop System Improves Glucose Control
MDedge Family Medicine
HbA1c Now the Standard for Diabetes Diagnosis : International Expert Committee's consensus opinion endorsed by three major associations
MDedge Family Medicine
Push to Lower Hemoglobin A1c, Back Off if No Response
MDedge Family Medicine
Exercise Improves Cardiac Markers in Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Vitamin D Goal Likely to Double for Older Adults
MDedge Family Medicine
Many Unaware of Their High Risk for Diabetes
MDedge Family Medicine
Diabetes 'Zindex' Composite Favors Liraglutide
MDedge Family Medicine
NAVIGATOR Drugs Miss Prevention Targets
MDedge Family Medicine
Fenofibrate Adds No Benefit to Diabetes Patients on a Statin
MDedge Family Medicine