News

Acceptance of 2009 H1N1 Flu Vaccine Was Poor


 

Major Finding: Only 37% of physicians and other health care workers were vaccinated against the pandemic virus.

Data Source: CDC data provided to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

Disclosures: Dr. Weinberg disclosed serving as a consultant to MedImmune, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck.

VAIL, COLO. — Acceptance of the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine by U.S. health care workers was, in a word, “terrible,” Dr. Adriana Weinberg declared.

A mere 37% of physicians and other health care workers were vaccinated against the pandemic virus, Dr. Weinberg reported at the conference sponsored by the Children's Hospital, Denver.

Uptake of the vaccine by two notably high-risk patient groups—pregnant women, and children and adolescents aged 6 months to 17 years—was equally poor at 38% and 37%, respectively, said Dr. Weinberg, professor of medicine, pediatrics, and pathology, and medical director of the clinical virology laboratory at the University of Colorado Hospital, also in Denver. These data were provided to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Among parents and other care providers for infants less than 6 months of age, vaccine acceptance was even worse at 14%.

Moreover, only 25% of adults aged 24-64 years with immunosuppression or other chronic medical conditions placing them at elevated risk for increased flu morbidity got vaccinated. That was essentially the same rate as in the overall U.S. population, including both high-priority and non–high-priority individuals.

As a result of this low uptake, many millions of soon-to-expire doses of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza monovalent vaccine are being destroyed.

In several studies, the main reason cited by health care workers and pregnant women for not accepting the vaccine was fear of side effects, especially Guillain-Barré syndrome, which was an issue with the 1976 swine flu vaccine. The safety concerns proved baseless this time around, as evidenced by consistently reassuring findings from three separate sources: the Vaccine Safety Datalink, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and the Emerging Infections Program.

For example, there were no deaths and no cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome among recipients of 438,376 doses of the vaccine in managed care organizations participating in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. And during surveillance for Guillain-Barré syndrome conducted through the Emerging Infections Program, the rate of cases was 1.92/100,000 person-years among vaccine recipients, compared with 1.21/100,000 person-years among nonrecipients. That 0.7/100,000 person-years excess of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with the pandemic H1N1 vaccine is similar to that associated with the seasonal influenza vaccine, according to Dr. Weinberg.

One audience member said the reason lots more families in his practice didn't get vaccinated against H1N1 wasn't fear of side effects; it was that he and other office-based physicians in his community didn't get shipments of the vaccine until after the second and as it turned out, final, wave of the 2009 pandemic had passed.

Dr. Weinberg agreed that lack of timely vaccine availability caused by long delays in the cumbersome manufacturing process was a huge problem. A potential solution would be to produce influenza vaccines in cell culture instead of eggs, something the Food and Drug Administration is very reluctant to allow, although one such flu vaccine was recently approved in Europe.

Another answer would be to identify common epitopes that confer cross-strain protection against all influenza strains, so a new vaccine wouldn't have to be created in advance of every flu season.

“There has been a big push on this. There are some good candidate epitopes emerging in the last year. We shall see,” the virologist said.

The vaccine being manufactured for the coming 2010-2011 flu season contains antigens for a pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus as well as a seasonal influenza A H3N2 Perth 2009 virus and an influenza B Brisbane 2008 virus.

The immunization schedule recommended by the CDC calls for a single dose of the vaccine for adults and children older than age 10 years.

Children aged 6 months to 9 years are to receive two doses 21 days apart unless they are in the minority who received the pandemic H1N1 monovalent vaccine last season, in which case they are to get a single dose of the trivalent vaccine. Despite this recommendation, a recent randomized controlled trial concluded that a single dose may be sufficiently immunogenic in young children (JAMA 2010;303:37-46).

“We do anticipate circulation of the pandemic H1N1 strain in the next flu season, but I have to caution you that in the Southern Hemisphere, where influenza season is going on right now, there is very, very little pandemic H1N1. What predominates are the A H3N2 and the B Brisbane,” she said.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Pandemic Flu Reassortment Could Pose New Threat
MDedge Family Medicine
PCV7 Reduced Penicillin-Nonsusceptible IPD
MDedge Family Medicine
CDC Mulls New HPV Vaccine Recommendations
MDedge Family Medicine
HPV Vaccine Reduced Risk of Abnormal Pap Test Results
MDedge Family Medicine
Data Watch: Parents Want More Online Communication With Children's Health Care Providers
MDedge Family Medicine
Cryptococcus gattii Emerges in Pacific Northwest
MDedge Family Medicine
Nosocomial C. difficile Common in Pneumonia
MDedge Family Medicine
Promising New Drugs on Horizon for Pandemic Influenza
MDedge Family Medicine
Tenofovir Vaginal Gel Blocked HIV Transmission
MDedge Family Medicine
STDs More Prevalent in Men on Erectile Dysfunction Drugs
MDedge Family Medicine