News

ADOPT Nixes Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Medically Ill

View on the News

Search Continues for the Safest Course

The ADOPT trial is the third clinical trial

evaluating extended prophylaxis in medically ill patients after EXCLAIM

(comparing enoxaparin vs. placebo) in 5,963 medically ill patients and Magellan

(rivaroxaban vs. enoxaparin) in 8,101 medically ill patients.

The first two showed

superiority of an extended prophylaxis regimen—enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once

a day (in EXCLAIM) and rivaroxaban 10mg daily in Magellan. However, both

occurred at the expense of major bleeding that was increased from 0.3% to 0.8%

with enoxaparin and from 0.4% to 1.1% with rivaroxaban.

ADOPT failed to show a

statistically significant difference in VTE with extended course of apixaban 2.5

mg SC twice daily, compared with enoxaparin 40 mg SC dosed once daily for 6-14

days. This finding was different from the other two trials. The trial was

underpowered for the primary efficacy end point because it lacked follow-up

with a systematic bilateral compression ultrasound exam in a third of the

patients.

However, similar to the

other two trials, ADOPT, too, showed increased rate of major bleeding. The

rates were 0.47% in the apixaban arm and only 0.19% in the enoxaparin arm, highlighting

yet again that extended prophylaxis is not safe in the medically ill

population.



Dr. Amir K. Jaffer

At this time, therefore,

extended prophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg SC once daily for up to 28 days

should be reserved for a highly select and significantly immobilized medically

ill group with age > 75 years,

history of VTE or history of cancer based upon findings from EXCLAIM while

neither rivaroxaban nor apixaban are yet FDA approved for VTE prevention in

medically ill patients.

In the meantime, the safest regimen and the

optimal duration of VTE prophylaxis therapy for the medically ill patients in

an age of a shorter and shorter length of stay remains elusive. The situation

holds research opportunities for hospitalists.

DR. AMIR K. JAFFER

is division chief of hospital medicine at the University of Miami. Dr. Jaffer stated he has no conflicts of interest.


 

FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION

"There’s a lot of discussion in the clinical research community about the importance of these ultrasound-detected venous thromboses, whether they truly translate into something that may impact on a patient or they perhaps just go away on their own. Including them in a primary end point, as in the ADOPT study, is really questionable in my mind," he added.

"This is an important medical problem that needs to be adequately treated, and I don’t think we’re doing a good enough job now."

Dr. Mary Cushman said that going forward it will be critical to develop validated risk prediction models to identify the medical inpatients at highest risk for post-discharge VTE. That’s the right population to study in clinical trials.

The increased VTE risk in medically ill patients is known to extend for 3 months post discharge. An important question to address in future trials of the new oral factor Xa inhibitors is whether they should be utilized for that full 3-month risk period, rather than 1 month as in ADOPT, observed Dr. Cushman, professor of medicine and pathology at the University of Vermont, Burlington.

Dr. Goldhaber said he and his coinvestigators are now analyzing their nearly 7,000-patient database to identify key predictors of VTE for incorporation into a new risk prediction model.

Apixaban goes by the trade name of Eliquis in Europe, where the drug is approved for VTE prophylaxis in patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement surgery. Eliquis is also the proposed trade name in the United States.

Apixaban in ADOPT failed to hit the home run it did earlier for stroke prevention in the setting of atrial fibrillation in the recently published, double-blind, randomized ARISTOTLE trial conducted in more than 18,000 patients. In ARISTOTLE, apixaban proved statistically significantly superior to warfarin in the key end points of prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, bleeding, and mortality (N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:981-92).

Simultaneous with Dr. Goldhaber’s presentation at the annual scientific sessions, ADOPT was published at http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1110899 (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110899).

Dr. Goldhaber disclosed that he has served as a consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, which sponsored the ADOPT trial. Dr. Antman and Dr. Cushman declared having no relevant financial interests.

Pages

Recommended Reading

ADHD Drugs Showed No Risk of Cardiovascular Events
MDedge Family Medicine
BP Readings Add Nothing to Pulse Oximetry Screening
MDedge Family Medicine
Defensive Medicine Factors Into Cardiac Admissions
MDedge Family Medicine
UPDATED: Vytorin Gets FDA Panel Nod for Some CKD Patients
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA Approves Rivaroxaban for Some Stroke Prevention
MDedge Family Medicine
Study Suggests Cardiologists Order More Images When Paid
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA: Trilipix May Not Cut Heart Attack Risk
MDedge Family Medicine
'C for Compressions' Usurps 'A for Airway'
MDedge Family Medicine
Dabigatran's First A Fib Year Starts Warfarin's Decline
MDedge Family Medicine
Which combination drug therapies are most effective for hypertension?
MDedge Family Medicine