Q&A

Should antioxidants be added to simvastatin and niacin for patients with coronary disease?

Author and Disclosure Information

Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Chait A, et al. Simvastatin and niacin, antioxidant vitamins, or the combination for the prevention of coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1583-92.


 

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antioxidant vitamins are commonly used in patients with coronary disease, but benefits have not been demonstrated. This randomized controlled trial studied whether addition of antioxidants to a simvastatin–niacin regimen improved outcomes.

POPULATION STUDIED: The investigators enrolled 160 patients with known coronary disease from the Seattle area and Canada. Subjects were included if they had clinical coronary disease (previous myocardial infarction [MI], coronary interventions, or confirmed angina); 3 or more coronary arteries with more than 30% stenosis or 1 stenosis more than 50%; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels less than 35 mg/dL in men or 40 mg/dL in women; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels less than 145 mg/dL; and triglyceride levels less than 400 mg/dL.

STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 regimens: simvastatin–niacin, antioxidant vitamins, simvastatin–niacin plus antioxidants, or placebo. Patients receiving simvastatin had their dose titrated to a goal LDL level of 40 to 90 mg/dL (mean final dose 13 mg/day). In patients receiving niacin, the dose was titrated over 1 month to at least 1000 mg twice per day (mean final dose 2.4 grams/day). Niacin 50 mg twice per day was used as the placebo to produce a flushing effect and thus keep patients blinded. Antioxidants were given twice daily, with total dosage of 800 IU vitamin E, 1000 mg vitamin C, 25 mg natural beta carotene, and 100 μg selenium. Coronary angiography was performed at baseline and finish; comparison of films was blinded. Patients were followed over 3 years. Analysis was by intent to treat with control for confounding with Cox proportional hazards.

OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of a cardiovascular event: revascularization, nonfatal MI, or death from coronary causes. The angiographic primary endpoint was the change in stenosis of the most severe lesion in the 9 proximal coronary segments. Cost, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were not addressed.

RESULTS: The groups were similar at baseline, with the exception that diabetics were more prevalent in the group receiving simvastatin–niacin plus antioxidants and less prevalent in the simvastatin–niacin alone group (P = .04). Patients receiving simvastatin–niacin had significantly fewer cardiovascular events than those given placebo (21% vs 2.6%, P = .003, number needed to treat = 4.7). Addition of antioxidants actually blunted this effect: when antioxidant therapy was added to lipid lowering, the rate of clinical events increased to that observed with placebo. There was also no difference between patients receiving antioxidants alone and those receiving placebo. These clinical results were mirrored by the angiographic data: patients receiving simvastatin and niacin experienced a reduction in average coronary stenosis (P < .001), whereas all other groups showed an increase in stenosis (P < .005).

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This well-designed study provides strong evidence that antioxidants should not be used in patients with preexisting coronary disease, either alone or in addition to simvastatin and niacin. The combination of a statin and niacin reduced adverse cardiac events dramatically in this population with low LDL cholesterol levels. Clinicians should keep in mind that these results may not be generalizable directly to women, people of color, or patients without coronary disease.

Recommended Reading

Does long-term erythromycin treatment reduce the number of common cold infections and subsequent exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?
MDedge Family Medicine
Can a simple warfarin initiation scheme predict the maintenance dose in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation?
MDedge Family Medicine
Can a bedside blood test predict death or myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with chest pain?
MDedge Family Medicine
What is the value of screening for heart disease with an exercise stress test (EST) in an asymptomatic person?
MDedge Family Medicine
In patients with heart disease, is the benefit of lipid-lowering therapy with statins similar in older patients to that in younger patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is early cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, facilitated by transesophageal echocardiography, safe and effective?
MDedge Family Medicine
Does a change to long-acting antianginals provide better symptom control, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life?
MDedge Family Medicine
In low to moderate risk patients with chest pain, is a 6-hour protocol able to accurately rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI)?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are new antihypertensive agents better than old antihypertensive agents in preventing cardiovascular complications?
MDedge Family Medicine
What Do We Know About Socioeconomic Status And Congestive Heart Failure? A Review of the Literature
MDedge Family Medicine