Original Research

Evidence-based guidelines for management of nursing home-acquired pneumonia

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The guidelines have 2 important limitations. They have not yet been approved by any official professional society, nor have they been tested prospectively. Prospective testing is required to validate whether, in fact, the proposed guidelines can be implemented and, if implemented, they will improve mortality, function, cost of care, rehospitalization rates, and community discharge rates. We chose not to seek official approval of the guidelines until they can be proven effective.

We believe the proposed guidelines can and should be used to the fullest extent possible by nursing homes and physicians who practice there, because the combination of evidence and consensus is strong. Nursing home-acquired pneumonia causes excess mortality and functional loss. The proposed guidelines, based as they are in empiric evidence, common sense, and expert consensus, offer some hope of decreasing rehospitalization and cost, mitigating functional decline, and improving survival.

APPENDIX: PANEL MEMBERS . Diana Blake, RN, Western Hills Health Care Center, Lakewood, CO; JoAnn G. Congdon, RN, PhD, University of Colorado HSC, Denver, CO; Douglas Fish, PharmD, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Evelyn Hutt, MD, University of Colorado HSC, Denver, CO; Denise Iskra, RN, Life Care of Westminster, Westminster, CO; Andrew M. Kramer, MD, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Thomas J. Marrie, MD, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Mark Loeb, MD, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Wayne C. McCormick, MD, MPH, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Annette M. Medina-Walpole, MD, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; David R. Mehr, MD, MS, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO; Michael S. Niederman, MD, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Mineola, NY; Phillip K. Peterson, MD, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; J. Mark Ruscin, PharmD, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Thomas T. Yoshikawa, MD, Charles Drew University, Los Angeles, CA.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the members of the panel for their thoughtful participation and willingness to review multiple drafts of the guidelines and manuscript; Steven Teutsch, MD, Senior Director, Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co., Inc., for his support and advice; Lisa Lampinen for manuscript preparation; and Merck & Co., Inc., for funding.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Can patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia be treated safely and effectively with oral antibiotics?
MDedge Family Medicine
When should acute nonvenereal conjunctivitis be treated with topical antibiotics?
MDedge Family Medicine
Does Amoxicillin Improve Outcomes in Patients with Purulent Rhinorrhea?
MDedge Family Medicine
Several options effective for postherpetic neuralgia
MDedge Family Medicine
Are antibiotics appropriate for the treatment of acute sinusitis in adults?
MDedge Family Medicine
Should patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori be treated with antibiotics?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are topical antibiotics effective in treating bacterial conjunctivitis?
MDedge Family Medicine
What are the current treatment and monitoring recommendations for hepatitis C virus (HCV)?
MDedge Family Medicine
Diagnosing Influenza: The Value of Clinical Clues and Laboratory Tests
MDedge Family Medicine
Is oral oseltamivir safe and effective for the prevention of influenza and its complications in frail elderly long-term care residents who have received influenza vaccine?
MDedge Family Medicine