Clinical Inquiries

Are nasal steroid sprays effective for otitis media with effusion?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Treatment of otitis media with effusion (OME) with nasal steroids is not recommended (strength of recommendation [SOR]=A, based on systematic review).

Limited evidence exists that shows nasal steroids may increase the rate of resolution of OME in the short term, alone or in combination with antibiotics (SOR: A, based on randomized controlled trials). However, within 3 to 12 weeks, resolution of OME with nasal steroids is no better than placebo. No evidence exists that treatment with nasal steroids has any effect on decreasing potential complications of OME, such as hearing loss and delayed language development.

Evidence summary

OME is diagnosed by visualization of an effusion on otoscopy, by limited tympanic membrane movement on insufflation, or by abnormal tympanometry, all in the absence of acute inflammation. OME is defined as chronic when the effusion has been present for at least 3 months.

The natural course of OME was observed in a longitudinal cohort study of 1439 children aged 2 years in the Netherlands. Single or recurrent flat screening tympanograms were noted in 20% and remitted spontaneously at a rate of 50% every 3 months.1 This prevalence and spontaneous resolution rate is consistent with other studies.

Three randomized controlled trials published in English tested intranasal steroids for OME (Table).

The Lilholdt study enrolled children through a private ear, nose, and throat clinic over autumn, winter, and spring with a primary or new bout of OME.

The Shapiro study enrolled children who had documented allergic rhinitis and OME with failure to respond to 4 weeks of oral antihistamine and decongestant therapy at time of entry. This was the only study with short-term follow-up comparing intranasal steroids with control. The odds ratio for OME persisting after 3 weeks was 2.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-6.90).3

The Tracy study enrolled children with chronic OME referred to a chronic ear clinic from October to June. Inclusion criteria included 3 episodes of acute otitis media in the prior 6 months or 4 episodes in the prior 12 months. This was a randomized comparison study with 3 treatment arms: an active nasal spray group and 2 control groups. The odds ratio for OME persisting after short-term follow-up was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.20-3.19); after intermediate follow-up the odds ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.21-2.44).

This study, which included a symptom score after 3 months, favored treatment, with a weighted mean difference of -4.5, but with wide 95% CI of -10.28 to 1.28. An effect was demonstrated on clearing effusions in the short term, but the advantage appeared to vanish for the most part by 3 months. The study did not evaluate improvements in hearing.4

No adverse effects of intranasal steroid treatment were seen except for transient drops in cortisol levels in the Shapiro study, which tested dexamethasone. Approximately 8 randomized controlled trials using oral steroids with and without antibiotics for OME and chronic OME mirror a trend for short-term benefit of treatment, spontaneous resolution, and frequent recurrence.

In summary, limited evidence exists for short-term improvement of OME with intranasal steroids plus antibiotics, and no evidence exists for lasting beneficial effect on effusion or OME associated hearing loss.

TABLE
Clinical trials: Intranasal steroids for otitis media with effusion

StudySubjectsGroupsDurationOutcome
Lilholdt 1982n=70 (aged 4-14 yrs with OME)Beclomethasone vs placebo2 moNo benefit at end of treatment month or after second month with no treatment by otoscopy, tympanometry, or audiometry.
Spontaneous improvement in 25% and resolution in 25%.1
Shapiro 1982n=45Dexamethasone vs placebo3 wk (aged 2-12 yrs with OME >1 mo)Normalization of ear pressure and middle ear gradient at 1 and 2 weeks of treatment group over placebo (P<.05).
No significant differences by third week.2
Tracy 1998n=61 (aged 3-11 yrs with chronic OME)Beclomethasone + amoxicillin vs placebo + amoxicillin vs amoxicillin alone12 wkBeclomethasone group showed a significantly greater frequency of resolution of chronic effusion at 4 and 8 weeks (P<.05) but not at 12 weeks, with improved middle ear pressures: left (P=.004) and right (P=.010) over the 12 weeks.3
OME, otitis media with effusion

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Risperidone improves behavior in children with autism
MDedge Family Medicine
Are antibiotics effective for otitis media with effusion?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are tympanostomy tubes indicated for recurrent acute otitis media?
MDedge Family Medicine
How should we manage infants at risk for group B streptococcal disease?
MDedge Family Medicine
Maternal screening strategy more effective than risk-based approaches for preventing group B streptococcal disease in neonates
MDedge Family Medicine
Children with fever and vomiting benefit from immediate antibiotics for acute otitis media
MDedge Family Medicine
Breastfeeding reduces pain in neonates
MDedge Family Medicine
Admission electronic fetal monitoring does not improve neonatal outcomes
MDedge Family Medicine
Patients with mild scoliosis have good prognosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Are early exposures linked with childhood peanut allergy?
MDedge Family Medicine