Q&A

What clinical features are useful in diagnosing strep throat?

Author and Disclosure Information

Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K, Carey M. Does this patient have strep throat? JAMA 2000; 284:2912-18.


 

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common complaint, with causes that include viruses and group A b-hemolytic streptococcus. Untreated pharyngitis due to this latter organism can lead to serious sequelae, such as peritonsillar abscess and rheumatic fever. A quick and accurate diagnosis, therefore, is important. Despite its relatively high prevalence among patients with pharyngitis, always performing a diagnostic laboratory test to uncover group A streptococcus is both impractical and costly. Identifying clinical correlates of strep throat would be useful.

POPULATION STUDIED: Adult and pediatric outpatients presenting with sore throat were studied.

STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: The authors performed a thorough MEDLINE search to identify and systematically review studies of the diagnosis of group A b-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in patients presenting with sore throat. Unpublished data were not sought. Initially 917 articles were identified, of which 9 met level I evidence criteria (large blinded prospective studies using throat culture as the reference standard). Pairs of authors reviewed each study, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The authors then pooled data to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of various history and physical examination elements. The authors only included studies with 300 or more subjects. Based on this threshold, 8 studies (1182 patients) were excluded from the pooled analysis.

OUTCOMES MEASURED: Primary outcomes measured included the sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- of different clinical features.

RESULTS: The presence of tonsillar exudate or, pharyngeal exudate and a history of streptococcus exposure in the previous 2 weeks were most useful in predicting current streptococcus pharyngitis (LR+ = 3.4, 2.1, and 1.9, respectively). The absence of tender anterior cervical lymph nodes, tonsillar enlargement, and tonsillar or pharyngeal exudate was most useful in ruling out strep throat (LR- = 0.60, 0.63, and 0.74, respectively).

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

No single history or physical examination element can effectively rule in or rule out strep throat. However, clinical prediction rules using a constellation of clinical symptoms and signs (such as presence of tonsillar or pharyngeal exudate and history of exposure to streptococcus) can be helpful in diagnostic testing and treatment decisions when patients present with a sore throat in the outpatient setting. No recommendations were made regarding which probability thresholds should be used when making treatment decisions.

Recommended Reading

Treatment of Influenza
MDedge Family Medicine
Oseltamivir for Flu Prevention
MDedge Family Medicine
Does Treatment of Acute Herpes Zoster Prevent or Shorten Postherpetic Neuralgia? A Systematic Review of the Literature
MDedge Family Medicine
Is azithromycin monotherapy as efficacious as cefuroxime plus erythromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is test-and-eradicate or prompt endoscopy more effective for treatment of dyspepsia in Helicobacter pylori–positive patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is a 5-day course of antibiotics as effective as a 10-day course for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and the prevention of poststreptococcal sequelae?
MDedge Family Medicine
HIV-Risk Practices Among Homeless and Low-Income Housed Mothers
MDedge Family Medicine
Information on Additional Echinacea Trials
MDedge Family Medicine
Current Status of Polio Immunization, with Recent Legal Implications
MDedge Family Medicine
Varicella Pneumonia at Parturition; A Non-Fatal Case Report
MDedge Family Medicine