Original Research

The Factors Associated with Disclosure of Intimate Partner Abuse to Clinicians

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Suggestions for future research

Although our findings support the need for direct clinician inquiry about IPA among all women patients in the medical setting, there is a need for more information about how to most effectively screen patients, particularly among demographically diverse populations. There is also a need for clarification around the meaning of “routine screening” and for information about the extent to which differences in screening practices might affect communication outcomes. These differences include factors such as the type of clinician doing the screening and the frequency of screenings (ie, screenings at every visit vs annually vs only if the patient is in a new relationship).

Relatively little is known about clinician-patient communication patterns among different immigrant groups in the United States. Although our study examined the general influence of birthplace on communication outcomes, most of the immigrant women in our study were from Spanish-speaking countries, and immigration was not a focus of our study. Future research might look specifically at determinants of communication among various immigrant groups in the United States, in particular, Asian women, about whom relatively little is known regarding abuse-related communication.

Finally, we were unable to specifically examine the determinants of decreased IPA communication among immigrant women. It is possible that decreased communication within this population may have resulted from less contact with the medical system or from differential treatment by medical clinicians. Future research might look more closely at this issue.

Acknowledgements

Our research was supported by the Commonwealth Foundation and by a grant under the Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research Program by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing, and the Office of Research on Minority Health, National Institute of Health, grant # 1 P30 AG15272. Dr Rodriguez was a Picker/Commonwealth Scholar when this work was completed. We wish to thank Drs Kevin Grumbach and Elizabeth McLoughlin for assistance with study design, Dr Liza Pressor for data collection, and Gregory Nah for data management. In addition, we thank the many San Francisco advocates against domestic violence for their input into the survey content and design, and we thank the women who participated in our study.

Related resources

Pages

Recommended Reading

When should we stop mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women?
MDedge Family Medicine
Is there any benefit to Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening in women who have had a hysterectomy for benign disease?
MDedge Family Medicine
Routine Screening for Postpartum Depression
MDedge Family Medicine
The Role of Gynecologists in Providing Primary Care to Elderly Women
MDedge Family Medicine
Should breech babies be delivered vaginally or by planned cesarean delivery?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are there adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor when there is no well-accepted indication?
MDedge Family Medicine
What is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women taking third-generation oral contraceptives (OCs) in comparison with those taking contraceptives containing levonorgestrel?
MDedge Family Medicine
Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
MDedge Family Medicine
Cesarean Delivery and Hospitals: Size Matters
MDedge Family Medicine
Differences in Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates: The Role of Pain Management
MDedge Family Medicine