1. Psaty BM, Weiss NS, Furberg CD. Recent trials in hypertension. Compelling science or commercial speech? JAMA 2006;295:1704-1706.
2. Abramson J, Starfield B. The effect of conflict of interest on biomedical research and clinical practice guidelines: Can we trust the evidence in evidence-based medicine? J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:414-418.
3. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:1167-1170.
4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of Atenolol and Captopril in Reducing Risk of Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ 1998;317:713-720.
5. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, et al. Effect of ACE inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP). Lancet 1999;353:611-616.
6. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. Randomized trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension 2 (STOP-Hypertension 2) study. Lancet 1999;354:1751-1756.
7. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomized to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet 2000;356:366-372.
8. Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, et al. For the NORDIL Study Group. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) Study. Lancet 2000;356:359-365.
9. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. For the LIFE study group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002;359:995-1003.
10. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to prevent Heart Attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997.
11. ALLHAT officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and lipidlowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension 2003;42:239-246.
12. Wing LMH, Reid CM, Ryan P, et al. For the Second Australian National blood pressure Study Group. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003;348:583-592.
13. Black HR, Elliott WJ, Grandits G, et al. For the CONVINCE research Group. Principal results of the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular End points (CONVINCE) trial. JAMA 2003;289:2073-2082.
14. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, et al. For the INVEST Investigators. A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:2805-2816.
15. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M. for the VALUE trial group. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomized trial. Lancet 2004;363:2022-2031.
16. Yui Y, Sumiyoshi T, Kodama K, et al. Comparison of nifedipine retard with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in Japanese hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: the Japan multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B (JMIC-B) randomized trial. Hypertens Res 2004;27:181-191.
17. Dahlof B, Sever PS, poulter NR. for the ASCOT investigators. prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:895-906.
18. Poulter NR, Wedel H, Dahlof B. For the ASCOT investigators. Role of blood pressure and other variables in the differential cardiovascular event rates noted in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA). Lancet 2005;366:907-913.
19. Daviglus ML, Liu K. today’s Agenda. We must focus on achieving favorable levels of all risk factors simultaneously. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2086-2087.
20. Duerden M. ASCOT-BPLA. Lancet 2006;367:206.-
21. Cave JA. ASCOT: A tale of two treatment regimes. Is ASCOT all it’s cracked up to be? BMJ 2005;331:1023.-
22. The ALLHAT officers and Coordinators for the AllHAt Collaborative research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2000;283:1967-1975.
23. Barzilay JI, Davis BR, Bettencourt J, et al. For the ALLHAT Collaborative research Group. Cardiovascular outcomes using doxazosin vs chlorthalidone for the treatment of hypertension in older adults with and without glucose disorders: a report from the ALLHAT Study. J Clin Hypertens 2004;6:116-125.
24. Whelton PK, Barzilay J, Cushman WC, et al. For the ALLHAT Collaborative research group. Clinical outcomes in antihypertensive treatment of type 2 diabetes, impaired fasting glucose concentration, and normoglycemia. Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1401-1409.
25. Rahman M, Pressel S, Davis BR, et al. For the ALLHAT Collaborative research Group. Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs a diuretic: a report from the ALLHAT Study. Arch Inten Med 2005;165:936-946.
26. Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA, et al. for the ALLHAT Collaborative research Group. outcomes in hyper-tensive black and nonblack patients treated with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. JAMA 2005;293:1595-1607.
27. Cushman WC, Ford CE, Cutler JA, et al. Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). J Clin Hypertens 2002;4:393-504.
28. Williams B. Drug treatment for hypertension: most patients will need a treatment cocktail –including a thiazide diuretic. BMJ 2003;326:61-62.
29. Appel LJ. the verdict from ALLHAT—thiazide diuretics are the preferred initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA 2002;288:3039-3042.
30. Salvetti A, Ghiadoni L. Guidelines for antihypertensive treatment: An update after the ALLHAT study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:S51-S54.
31. Frohlich ED. Treating hypertension-what are we to believe? N Engl J Med 2003;348:639-641.
32. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. For the LIFE study group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002;359:1004-1010.
33. Messerli FH, Grossman E, Lever AF. Do thiazide diuretics confer specific protection against strokes? Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2557-2560.
34. Opie LH, Schall R. Evidence-based evaluation of calcium channel blockers for hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:315-322.
35. Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004;364:1684-1689.
36. Khan N, McAlister FA. Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2006;174:1737-1742.
37. Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Brunner H, et al. for the VALUE Trial Group. Characteristics of 15314 hypertensive patients at high coronary risk. the VALUE trial. Blood Press 2001;10:83-91.
38. Weber MA, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Blood pressure dependent and independent effects of antihypertensive treatment on clinical events in the VALUE trial. Lancet 2004;363:2049-2051.
39. The Heart outcomes prevention evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000;342:145-153.
40. Svensson P, De Faire U, Sleight P, Yusuf S, Ostergren J. Comparative effects of ramipril on ambulatory and office blood pressures: a Hope substudy. Hypertension 2001;38:28-32.
41. Ong HT. Beta-blockers in hypertension and cardiovascular disease. BMJ 2007;334:946-949.
42. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The National High blood pressure education program Coordinating Committee.The Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, Detection, evaluation, and treatment of High blood pressure. the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560-2572.
43. Guidelines Committee. 2003 european Society of Hypertension-european Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21:1011-1053.
44. World Health Organization. International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organisation (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21:1983-1992.
45. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, et al. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the british Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV. J Hum Hypertens 2004;18:139-185.
46. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Libby P. for the CAMELOT investigators. effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure. the CAMELOT Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:2217-2226.
47. Hedblad B, Wikstrand J, Janzon L, Wedel H, Berglund G. Low dose Metoprolol CR/XL and Fluvastatin slow progression of carotid intima-media thickness: main results from the beta-blocker Cholesterol-lowering Asymptomatic plaque Study (BCAPS). Circulation 2001;103:1721-1726.
48. Freemantle N, Cleland J, Young P, Mason J, Harrison J. Beta-blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ 1999;318:1730-1737.
49. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med 1992;372:685-691.
50. MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: metoprolol CR/XL randomised Intervention trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 1999;353:2001-2006.
51. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001;345:851-860.
52. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Mortensen JB, et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001;345:870-878.
53. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, Zeeuw D de, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001;345:861-869.
54. Wright JT, Bakris G, Greene T, et al. For the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Study Group. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. JAMA 2002;288:2421-2431.