PURLs

Stroke prevention: Age alone does not rule out warfarin

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Practice changer

Warfarin is as safe as aspirin and more effective for stroke prevention in elders with atrial fibrillation

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A: Well-designed randomized controlled trial of elderly patients in the primary care setting, consistent with findings from prior RCTs

Mant et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study [BAFTA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:493–503.1

Illustrative Case

An 85-year-old woman with hypertension and chronic atrial fibrillation has transferred her care to you. She takes an aspirin a day for cardiovascular prevention. You know that warfarin is better than aspirin for preventing stroke but worry about the increased risk of bleeding with warfarin.

Should you recommend that she stay on aspirin or switch to warfarin?

Background: BAFTA: A realistic study

We have been reluctant to use warfarin in elders with atrial fibrillation for good reason: risk of hemorrhage. Since there are few trials looking at use of warfarin among elders in primary care settings, we are uncertain about the balance of benefits and harms.

The BAFTA study1 is the first trial to compare outcomes of warfarin vs aspirin in elders specifically, in the less-than-ideal conditions of real life.

Guidelines mirror uncertainties

This uncertainty is reflected even in guidelines for anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

  • The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians Seventh Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy recommends treating all patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of stroke with warfarin. Their definition of high-risk includes any patient with 1 or more of the following risk factors: age >75 years, prior ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism, congestive heart failure, impaired left ventricular systolic function, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus.2
  • In contrast, the 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation from the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and European Society of Cardiology, are more conservative. They recommend that patients with more than 1 risk factor take warfarin, and patients with only 1 risk factor (for example, a patient older than 75 years of age with no other risk factors) take either warfarin or aspirin.3

Clinical context: Reasonable concerns

Fewer than half of the 10% to 12% of people older than 75 with atrial fibrillation are taking warfarin for stroke prevention. In one study, only 35% of patients 85 years and older with no known contraindication to anticoagulation received warfarin.4 Possible reasons for this low rate include:

  • cost of monitoring warfarin
  • concerns about compliance
  • increased risk of hemorrhage
  • prior studies focused on younger patients, in closely monitored settings.

These factors lead us to speculate that many physicians believe that the risks of warfarin in elderly patients in primary care settings outweigh any potential benefit.

We think this study demonstrates that we should seriously discuss and consider warfarin therapy for most of our elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Age alone does not preclude warfarin

The key finding from the BAFTA study is that advanced age alone is not a contraindication to the use of warfarin for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation

Study summary: Primary care setting, elders only

This prospective randomized open-label trial was designed to test the effectiveness and safety of warfarin vs aspirin in the elderly, in a realistic primary care setting. The study compared the frequency of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and other significant arterial embolism in patients taking either warfarin or aspirin.

Inclusion criteria. Patients were at least 75 years old (average 81.5 years) with an ECG within the previous 2 years showing atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Seventy percent of the patients had been previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and 30% were identified because they had an irregular pulse on exam.

Pages

Copyright © 2007 The Family Physicians Inquiries Network.
All rights reserved.

Online-Only Materials

AttachmentSize
PDF icon 5611jfp_purl1-upt1.pdf121.33 KB

Recommended Reading

Nursing Home Segregation, Disparities Detailed
MDedge Family Medicine
Delirium Management Still Elusive, Studies Needed
MDedge Family Medicine
Insomnia Treatment in the Elderly Is Complex, Unpredictable
MDedge Family Medicine
Proton Pump Inhibitors Are Overused in the Elderly
MDedge Family Medicine
Hospital Discharge Rife For Adverse Drug Events
MDedge Family Medicine
Protein C Is Linked to Cognitive Impairment Following ICU Stay
MDedge Family Medicine
ACE Inhibitors May Slow Mental Decline, Early Data Show
MDedge Family Medicine
Malnutrition Missed in Hospitalized Elderly
MDedge Family Medicine
For Nausea at End of Life, Think Mechanistically
MDedge Family Medicine
Should we use appetite stimulants for malnourished elderly patients?
MDedge Family Medicine