Clinical Inquiries

Are DMARDs effective for rheumatologic diseases besides rheumatoid arthritis?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

For other rheumatic diseases, studies are mixed

Due to cyclosporine’s toxicity, less toxic DMARDs are being evaluated to replace it for treatment of other rheumatic diseases. A recent randomized controlled trial of 100 patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated systemic vasculitis showed methotrexate may be able to replace cyclosporine for both induction of remission (methotrexate=89.8% vs cyclosporine=93.5%; P=.041) and maintenance of remission (69.5% vs 46.5% at 18 months; P=.023).10

Initial trials on other rheumatic diseases have been small and have had varied results. There are mixed studies on the effectiveness of adding methotrexate to corticosteroids for giant cell arteritis.11,12

There has been no evidence of efficacy for the new TNF antagonists in either a small study on Sjögren’s syndrome (n=14)13 or a larger study on Wegener’s granulomatosis (n=180).14

The studies for use of DMARDs in lupus or scleroderma are of limited quality.

Recommendations from others

The Italian Society for Rheumatology consensus guidelines recommends TNF antagonists be considered in active psoriatic arthritis resistant to (a) NSAIDs, (b) at least 2 local steroid injections, and (c) at least 2 conventional DMARDs for patients with peripheral arthritis or enthesitis. They also recommend TNF antagonists be considered for psoriatic spondylitis resistant to NSAIDs.15

The Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis, based on a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion, indicate that:

  • There is good evidence for using NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors for symptomatic treatment.
  • Conventional DMARDs are not well supported.
  • TNF antagonists show a large benefit in both pain and function.

The ASAS/EULAR recommendation indicate that there is no evidence that any of these treatments actually modify the disease progression.16

Acknowledgments

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the views of the US Air Force medical service or the US Air Force at large.

Pages

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

MRI Improves Rheumatoid Arthritis Care
MDedge Family Medicine
Tocilizumab Is Beneficial in Moderate to Severe RA
MDedge Family Medicine
Long-Term Steroids in RA May Cut Function
MDedge Family Medicine
Crystal Shape, Size Distinguish Types of Gout
MDedge Family Medicine
'Anemia of Inflammation' Explains Iron Issues in RA
MDedge Family Medicine
Study Affirms Safety of Long-Term Etanercept Use in JRA
MDedge Family Medicine
Inflammation May Drive Comorbidities in RA
MDedge Family Medicine
Functional MRI Reveals Brain Damage in Lupus
MDedge Family Medicine
Family History, Smoking Promote Cartilage Loss
MDedge Family Medicine
Acute onset of rash and oligoarthritis
MDedge Family Medicine