• In a patient with a high risk of reinfarction, thienopyridine therapy (with clopidogrel or prasugrel) should be continued for at least a year. B
• Risk factors for reinfarction and stent thrombosis are the same ones that increase the risk of ACS initially, and include diabetes mellitus, heart failure, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. A
• For patients who are good candidates for triple therapy but have an elevated bleeding risk, using a lower dose of aspirin or limiting thienopyridine use to one month may be a reasonable option. B
Strength of recommendation (SOR)
A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series
CASE Anthony D, a 61-year-old patient of yours with hypertension and diabetes, is admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation and chest pain that radiates to his left arm and hand. On Day 1, he receives aspirin 325 mg and enoxaparin 1 mg/kg; the following day, the patient receives a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel prior to catheterization. He undergoes percutaneous coronary intervention and a bare metal stent is placed in his circumflex artery.
The following day, Anthony is ready for discharge and you consider which maintenance drugs to put him on, given that he already takes multiple medications. Is he a candidate for triple therapy?
Triple therapy—the concurrent use of aspirin, a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent, and warfarin—is often prescribed for patients with atrial fibrillation who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or require percutaneous coronary intervention with the placement of a stent (PCI-S). The danger associated with concomitantly treating a patient with 3 agents, each of which has a distinct mechanism that increases bleeding risk, is high, but for carefully selected patients, the benefit may outweigh the risk.
Several studies have evaluated triple therapy and compared it with single or dual therapy (TABLE).1-5 Due to a lack of robust outcome studies, however, the benefits and risks of triple therapy cannot be directly quantified, nor are they generalizable to all potential candidates for triple therapy. Thus, finding the optimal treatment for secondary prevention of ACS or prevention of stent thrombosis in a patient with atrial fibrillation requires an understanding of the potential consequences of triple therapy—and a thorough assessment of the patient’s risk of reinfarction, stroke, and bleeding complications.6-9 To make the best treatment decisions and provide adequate support to patients who were started on triple therapy during a recent hospitalization, here’s what you need to know.
TABLE
Triple therapy: What the studies show
Study type (N) | Intervention | Efficacy | Bleeding |
---|---|---|---|
Retrospective (124)1 | Group 1: Aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin Group 2: Nontriple therapy | No significant difference | No significant difference in early major bleeding Group 1: Significant increase in late major bleeding |
Retrospective (373)2 | Group 1: Anticoagulant + antithrombotic therapy* Group 2: Antithrombotic therapy only | Group 1: Significant improvement in efficacy Significant improvement in combination of efficacy and bleeding outcomes | Group 1: Significant improvement in combination of efficacy and bleeding outcomes |
Cohort (800)3 | Group 1: Warfarin + single antiplatelet agent Group 2: Warfarin + dual antiplatelet therapy | No significant difference in mortality or MI | NR |
Prospective (359)4 | Group 1: Continued OAC + dual antiplatelet therapy Group 2: Discontinued OAC but continued antiplatelet therapy | No significant difference | Group 1: Significant increase in moderate and severe bleeding |
Cohort (82,854)5 | Group 1: Warfarin monotherapy Group 2: Aspirin monotherapy Group 3: Clopidogrel monotherapy Group 4: Clopidogrel + aspirin Group 5: Warfarin + aspirin Group 6: Warfarin + clopidogrel Group 7: Warfarin + aspirin + clopidogrel | No significant difference | Groups 6 and 7: Significant increase in crude incidence of bleeding |
*50% of the participants in Group 1 received triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin). MI, myocardial infarction; NR, not reported; OAC, oral anticoagulant. |
First, a review of the components
Aspirin, a key component of triple therapy, is the only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.10,11 The reason: Aspirin is more selective for cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) than other NSAIDs and irreversibly inhibits COX enzymes.11 The aspirin-induced decrease in thromboxane production leads to a decline in platelet activation and aggregation, which accounts both for aspirin’s beneficial cardiovascular effects and the associated risk of bleeding—aspirin’s most common adverse effect.12
Most major bleeds linked to aspirin use involve the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, primarily because of the drug’s direct and indirect effects on the GI mucosa.11-14 Aspirin’s toxicities are dose related, but its antiplatelet properties do not appear to be.14
Adding a thienopyridine
Thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs indicated for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events after ACS or PCI-S include ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel.15 Ticlopidine, the first such agent approved in the United States, is rarely used because of potential neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura.16