Commentary

PSA screening isn’t “nonsense”—it saved my life


 

I read Dr. Susman’s editorial on PSA screening (J Fam Pract. 2011;60:319) with great personal interest.

I am 43 years old; I have no family history of prostate cancer and had no symptoms. Yet my Gleason 7 prostate cancer was found by a PSA test. You can argue that statistically, it would be better that I be allowed to die so that 722 others could be spared the stress of testing, some subset of those could be spared a biopsy, and some still smaller subset could be spared overtreatment. But my PSA test wasn’t “screening nonsense,” as Dr. Susman laments. It was ordered by a wise and caring physician and it saved my life.

Go ahead and take a position based on statistics. But please don’t dismiss the judgment of other knowledgeable professionals as “nonsense.”

Scott Orwig
Saline, MI

Recommended Reading

International Association Favors CT Screening of Heavy Smokers
MDedge Family Medicine
Cancer Survivors Lag in Care for Comorbid Conditions
MDedge Family Medicine
No Increased Acute Myeloid Leukemia Risk in First-Degree Relatives
MDedge Family Medicine
Study: Update Family History Every 5 to 10 Years
MDedge Family Medicine
Panel Backs Accelerated Approval of Brentuximab for Lymphomas
MDedge Family Medicine
Obesity, Estrogen Status Influence Breast Cancer Outcomes
MDedge Family Medicine
Triptorelin Cuts Early Menopause in Breast Cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
Intensified Temozolomide Fails to Hike Glioblastoma Survival
MDedge Family Medicine
Occult Sentinel Node Metastases Don't Impact Survival
MDedge Family Medicine
CAD Software Does Not Improve Mammogram Accuracy
MDedge Family Medicine