News

Obesity-hunger paradox prevalent in low-income cancer survivors


 

AT THE ASPO ANNUAL MEETING

The investigators found that two-thirds of all respondents were either overweight or obese (34% and 29% respectively), with nearly three-quarters (71%) reporting food insecurity, ranging from not knowing where the next nutritious meal would be found to not eating for an entire day.

Although the BMI of men in the study did not vary significantly according to whether they experienced food insecurity, the BMI of the women in the group did. Women who reported food insecurity along with moderate hunger had the highest BMI, while those who reported food insecurity and severe hunger had the lowest (27 vs. 26.6). Women who reported their food supply was secure had, on average, a BMI of 27.2.

The women with both food insecurity and obesity had the greatest measure of impaired quality of life. As for why women should be more affected than men, Dr. Philip said several hypotheses exist, including biomechanical ones such as women’s natural propensity to gain more weight than men, and women as caretakers forsaking their own meals in order to nourish others, but that no one knows for certain.

Overall, the implications are "troubling," said Dr. Philip. "In the general population, about 15% will endorse some kind of food insecurity. For individuals living below the poverty line, that number rises to about 40%. Among those individuals who also have cancer, the number rises to 70%."

Because many cancers have been associated with excess weight and low-quality nutrition, Dr. Philip said it was important for primary care providers to be aware that while these patients are vulnerable to begin with, dealing with cancer while also juggling the effects of both obesity and a lack of nutritious food means they are even more strained.

"Primary care providers can’t make the assumption that a patient who is overweight or obese is representative of that person having sufficient food," Dr. Philip said.

Dr. Philip did not report any relevant disclosures. Support for this research was provided by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the New York Community Trust, Susan G. Komen for the Cure (Greater New York City affiliate), and the Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund.

This article was updated March 19, 2014.

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Colonoscopy risk reductions go beyond screening
MDedge Family Medicine
Ruling out malignancy in setting of an adnexal mass
MDedge Family Medicine
Thyroid cancer rise mostly overdiagnosis
MDedge Family Medicine
U.K. ahead of U.S.A. in cancer survivorship planning
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: How to improve cancer survivorship planning
MDedge Family Medicine
USPSTF: Insufficient evidence to judge vitamin supplements
MDedge Family Medicine
Hormone therapy predicted improved lung cancer survival in women
MDedge Family Medicine
Nivolumab extends survival in advanced melanoma
MDedge Family Medicine
Difficulty swallowing
MDedge Family Medicine
Groups launch CRC screening campaign as incidence declines
MDedge Family Medicine