News

Evidence questioned in debate over monitoring dabigatran levels to avert bleeds


 

References

Therefore, "while monitoring drug levels to optimize benefit-risk balance has intuitive appeal, given the complex exposure-response relationship and confounding effects of demographic variables, this should remain an area of active investigation. It is not ready for prime time to inform or guide clinical practice," Dr. Kaul said.

Dr. Kaul disclosed that he is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and has equity interest in Johnson and Johnson.

At press time, the FDA had not responded to a request for a comment on the BMJ investigation.

emechcatie@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Many acute HF patients overuse emergency departments
MDedge Family Medicine
The Medical Roundtable: New Marker of Heart Failure Outcomes: Galectin-3
MDedge Family Medicine
The Medical Roundtable: Current and Future Strategies for Overcoming Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure
MDedge Family Medicine
Apixaban approved for treating DVT, pulmonary embolism and reducing risk of recurrence
MDedge Family Medicine
The Medical Roundtable: Heart Disease in Women
MDedge Family Medicine
USPSTF: Offer behavioral counseling to prevent cardiovascular disease
MDedge Family Medicine
AHA wants e-cigarettes regulated but notes they help some smokers quit
MDedge Family Medicine
New cholesterol guideline outperforms ATP III
MDedge Family Medicine
Typical risk factors don’t always red-flag coronary disease in IBD patients
MDedge Family Medicine
High-risk patients benefit from BP self-monitoring
MDedge Family Medicine

Related Articles