News

Lose the weight or lose the money: Online weight-loss contracts gain favor


 

AT NAPCRG 2014

References

NEW YORK – The more you stand to lose, the deeper your commitment to losing, particularly when it’s your wallet and not your word that’s at stake.

People who contractually committed online to lose a certain amount of weight or else fork over a predetermined amount of cash to a friend, a favorite charity, or even a hated charity were, on average, successful at losing 5.2% of their body weight, according to preliminary data presented at the annual meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group.

Dr. Lenard Lesser

Dr. Lenard Lesser

In a retrospective analysis of 5,024 self-selected participants in an online contractual weight loss site, 70% of whom were women whose average age was 39 years, the ones who pledged to let their money go to an “anticharity” if they didn’t meet their weight loss goals lost nearly 8% of their body weight. Those who pledged to give to a favorite charity lost just under 7%, and those who promised to pay a friend if they didn’t succeed lost 6.3% of their body weight. Those whose commitment did not involve any cash lost 3.4% of their body weight.

“If you are for gun control, your anticharity would be the National Rifle Association,” Dr. Lenard Lesser, a family physician and researcher at the Palo Alto (Calif.) Medical Foundation and Research Institute, said in an interview. “So, if you don’t lose the weight you said you’d lose, then the money you committed would go to the NRA.”

There was no statistical difference in weight loss between those who committed to either a charity or an anticharity, but according to Dr. Lesser, the data, set to be published in the near future, indicated that there was a statistical difference between the amount of weight lost when money was committed compared with when no money was committed. “People are averse to losing money wherever it goes,” he said.

The average duration of the weight loss commitments in the online weight loss commitment study were between 10 and 16 weeks, but it is unclear whether the weight loss was permanent, and whether the contracts could serve as a viable weight loss intervention in the primary care setting, according to Dr. Lesser. “We don’t know what happens to these people long term. We need to explore how these contracts can be integrated into a more comprehensive system.”

wmcknight@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @whitneymcknight

Recommended Reading

Schools rarely comply with USDA nutritional standards
MDedge Family Medicine
Presurgical BMI doesn’t predict diabetes remission
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: IMPROVE-IT exonerates ezetimibe, proves LDL hypothesis
MDedge Family Medicine
Bariatric surgery an opportunity to screen for endometrial cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA issues final rules requiring calorie tally in restaurants
MDedge Family Medicine
Is immediate-release topiramate an effective treatment for adult obesity?
MDedge Family Medicine
New evidence suggests 2014 hypertension guidelines could backfire
MDedge Family Medicine
Randomized trial assesses behavioral weight loss as migraine treatment
MDedge Family Medicine
Obesity can cut 19 years of health, 8 years of life
MDedge Family Medicine
New use for old DXA scanners?
MDedge Family Medicine