Practice Economics

Supreme Court justices appear split on ACA tax subsidies


 

References

Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute had originally predicted a 6-3 rule in favor of the challengers. However, after the arguments, he now says it’s anyone’s call.

“My only prediction is that it’s a complete toss-up,” he said in an interview. “Whichever side anyone thought had the edge before argument has to temper their expectations, because I would give each side an even 50-50 shot at this point.”

The Justices’ decision is expected in June.

agallegos@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @legal_med

Pages

Recommended Reading

Supreme Court’s ruling could jeopardize state medical board regulation
MDedge Family Medicine
Turning team-based care into a winning proposition
MDedge Family Medicine
Team-based care: Worth a second look
MDedge Family Medicine
Justices gear up to hear arguments in ACA subsidy case
MDedge Family Medicine
Telemedicine: Tuning in to teens
MDedge Family Medicine
EHR adoption challenges persist for older physicians, smaller practices
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA: Limit testosterone use to men with specific medical conditions
MDedge Family Medicine
Family telemedicine
MDedge Family Medicine
Cancer society critical of new chemo payment bundle
MDedge Family Medicine
PQRS participation varies by specialty
MDedge Family Medicine