News

Pediatric BMI improves with motivational interviewing

View on the News

Findings raise questions, point to integrated approach

Recommendations for preventing and treating pediatric obesity suggest a staged approach with escalating intensity of care. Outcomes of clinical interventions for pediatric obesity are variable. In primary care settings, some interventions promote changes in diet, physical activity or television viewing, but do not achieve reductions in BMI; others have favorable, albeit sometimes small, effects on BMI. Although effective for certain patients/families, weight management clinics often are not feasible because of barriers associated with accessibility, transportation, and cost. Clearly, novel approaches are necessary to enhance interventions in primary care settings. The trial reported by Resnicow et al. in this issue of Pediatrics provides impressive data on the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) to reduce BMI in primary care.

Several components of the trial reported by Resnicow et al. provide impetus for asking important questions when developing integrated care models for treating pediatric obesity. What linkages can be established between primary care practices and weight management clinics to coordinate care with obesity specialists (psychologist, dietitian, physicians) when necessary? Linkages must extend beyond referrals and notes in electronic medical records to systems for training, ongoing consultation, and possible comanagement. How can PCPs facilitate access to specialty colleagues for collaboration? Emerging communication technology could support such enhanced access. How can we ensure adequate and efficient “handoffs” among members of a team in different settings? How can interaction with community partners be extended, beyond PCPs advising patients to use programs, to obtaining updates on progress of individual patients?

Clearly, answers to these questions require collaboration among numerous stakeholders. Substantial effort must be directed toward coordinating care across settings to integrate services centered on the comprehensive needs of patients/families and measuring performance of care-coordination activities.

Cara B. Ebbeling, Ph.D., of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center, at Boston Children’s Hospital, and Richard C. Antonelli, M.D. of Boston Children’s Hospital. These comments are excerpted from an editorial accompanying Dr. Resnicow and associates’ study (Pediatrics 2015 March 30 [doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0495]). The editorial was supported by the New Balance Foundation, but the authors had no relevant financial disclosures.


 

FROM PEDIATRICS

References

Using an empathetic family-centered communication strategy known as motivated interviewing while counseling parents of young children with obesity resulted in greater improvements in children’s weight status over 2 years, a study found.

“This is among the first counseling interventions using MI [motivational interviewing] and delivered in primary care to yield significant effects on adiposity,” reported Kenneth Resnicow, Ph.D., of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and his associates.

“Research is needed to determine the clinical significance and persistence of the BMI effects observed. Given the relatively modest dose, the intervention appears to have considerable dissemination potential, which can be explored in future studies,” they wrote (Pediatrics 2015 March 30 [doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1880]).

The researchers randomly assigned 42 pediatric practices to either usual care (n = 198) or one of two interventions for treating patients aged 2-8 years with a BMI between the 85th and 97th percentile. Only children without diabetes, prior specialist weight loss treatment, or chronic medical conditions, disorders, or syndromes were included. Practices were compensated with reimbursement and incentives for their participation. They were part of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network, composed of 1,676 practitioners from 712 practices with nationally representative patient populations.

Both interventions included the primary care providers’ receiving 2 days of in-person training in motivational interviewing and behavior therapy and then scheduling four counseling sessions with children’s parents. These providers also received a DVD training system focused on pediatric obesity. The second intervention group (n = 235) included a registered dietitian trained in motivational interviewing who scheduled six counseling sessions, in person or by phone with the parents.

Average baseline BMI percentile across all participating children was 91.9, with 60% white, 22% Hispanic, 7% black, and 6% Asian ethnicities. The 2-year follow-up data available for 71% of the children showed, after adjustment for confounders, an average BMI percentile of 90.3 in the usual care group, 88.1 in the group with motivational interviewing from providers only, and 87.1 in the group with providers’ and dietitians’ motivational interviewing: Mean changes from baseline in BMI percentile were 1.8, 3.8, and 4.9 across groups 1, 2, and 3. However, only the difference between the group with dietitians and the usual care group was statistically significant, even though few dietitians succeeded in completing all six counseling sessions with families. Difficulties encountered by the dietitians included family scheduling challenges and inadequate integration into the practice’s care team.

“One somewhat surprising finding was the relatively large BMI reduction in the usual care group: 1.8 BMI units. Although the effects on BMI observed in group 2 [physicians only providing motivational interviewing] were slightly better than the usual care group, they were not statistically significant. Had the usual care group exhibited the degree of change we expected, then these effects would have achieved statistical significance,” the investigators said.

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the American Academy of Pediatrics funded the research. The authors reported no disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Staying fit or fearing fat?
MDedge Family Medicine
Medicaid expansion brings coverage to more diabetes patients
MDedge Family Medicine
Evidence inadequate to support routine thyroid screening
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Ask vitiligo patients about autoimmune symptoms
MDedge Family Medicine
Cardiovascular safety evidence for alogliptin reassuring
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA approves another VEGF inhibitor for diabetic retinopathy in patients with DME
MDedge Family Medicine
Long-term endocrine effects common after reduced-intensity chemotherapy in children
MDedge Family Medicine
Overall physical health strongly predicts arthritis pain
MDedge Family Medicine
Anticipation runs high for coming megatrials in general cardiology
MDedge Family Medicine
Pamphlet helped Graves’ patients find peace with treatment choices
MDedge Family Medicine