Clinical Review

Role of Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brain Metastasis

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung has been reported in multiple phase 2 studies using various chemotherapeutic agents. The reported RR ranged from 35% to 50%.22-24 Comparative studies of combined chemoradiotherapy demonstrated a 33% RR in contrast to a 27% RR for combined therapy or chemotherapy alone, respectively. However, no difference was noted in median survival rates.25

Care must be taken when interpreting these studies due to heterogeneity of the patient population studied and a lack of data on potential synergistic toxicities between radiation to the CNS and systemic therapy. The authors generally avoid concurrent chemotherapy during CNS irradiation in patients who may have significant survival times > 1 year.

The prognosis of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis largely depends on the number and size of metastatic brain lesions, performance status, extracranial or systemic involvement, and systemic treatment following brain irradiation. The median survival of patients with brain metastasis and radiation therapy is generally about 18 months. The median survival for patients with breast cancer who develop brain metastasis was 3 years from diagnosis of the primary breast cancer.26

Recent advances in systemic agents/options for patients with breast cancer can significantly affect the decision-making process in regard to the treatment of brain lesions in these patients. For example, a few retrospective studies have clearly demonstrated the beneficial effect of trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer with brain metastasis. The median OS in HER2-positive patients with brain metastasis was significantly extended to 41 months when treated with HER2-targeted trastuzumab vs only 
13 months for patients who received no treatment.27,28 As a result of the expected prolonged survival, SRS for small and isolated brain lesions has recently become a much more attractive option as a way of mitigating the deleterious long-term effect of whole brain irradiation (memory decline, somnolence, etc).

Summary

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a newly developed radiation therapy technique of highly conformal and focused radiation. For the treatment of patients with favorable prognostic factors and limited brain metastases, especially single brain metastasis, crainiotomy and SRS seems similarly effective and appropriate choices of therapy. Some studies question the possible benefits of additional WBRT to local therapy, such as crainiotomy or radiosurgery.

Some authors recommend deferral of WBRT after local brain therapy and reserving it for salvage therapy in cases of recurrence or progression of brain disease because of possible long-term AEs of whole brain irradiation as well as deterioration of QOL in long-term survivors. Thus, the role of additional WBRT to other local therapy has not been fully settled; further randomized studies may be necessary. Due to the controversies and complexities surrounding the treatment choices for patients with brain disease, all treatment decisions should be individualized and should involve close multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Comparison of Initial Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between VA and Nonveteran Populations
Federal Practitioner
A Retrospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Veteran Patients With Agent Orange Exposure and Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner
The Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism/Adverse Drug Events in VA Loma Linda Oncology Patients on Warfarin vs Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Federal Practitioner
Did the FDA Black Box Warning Have Any Effect on Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Use?
Federal Practitioner
AVAHO Education Chair Mary Thomas on the AVAHO Meeting Program
Federal Practitioner
Annual Conference Caps Active Year for AVAHO
Federal Practitioner
What to Do in Washington, DC
Federal Practitioner
New AVAHO President Looks Ahead
Federal Practitioner
2015 AVAHO Meeting Highlights
Federal Practitioner
Mindfulness as a Tool for Patients With Cancer
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles