Original Research

Hepatitis A Virus Prevention and Vaccination Within and Outside the VHA in Light of Recent Outbreaks

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

There was wide geographic variability in rates of HAV susceptibility (Figure 1).

When limiting the analysis to patients with confirmed vaccination within the VHA or active duty military service after October 1997, VA facilities in states with active outbreaks had a mean HAV vaccination rate of 38.1% (range 31.5%-44.3%) among patients who were homeless and 42.0% (range 33.8%-49.0%) among patients with SUD.

Discussion

Widespread HAV vaccination has decreased the incidence of HAV infection in the US dramatically. Nevertheless, recent outbreaks demonstrate that substantial population susceptibility and associated risk for HAV-related morbidity and mortality remains, particularly in high-risk populations. Although the VHA has not experienced a significant increase in acute HAV infections to date, this cross-sectional analysis highlights that a large proportion of VA patients in traditionally high-risk groups remain susceptible to HAV infection.

Strengths

Strengths of this analysis include a current reflection of HAV susceptibility within the national VHA, thus informing HAV testing and vaccination strategies. This study also involves a very large cohort, which is possible because the VHA is the largest integrated healthcare system in the US. Lastly, because the VHA uses electronic medical records, there was nearly complete capture of HAV vaccinations and testing obtained through the VHA.

Limitations

This cross-sectional analysis has several potential limitations. First, findings may not be generalizable outside the VHA. In addition, determination of homelessness, substance abuse, and HIV infection were based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, which have been used in previous studies but may be subject to misclassification. The authors deliberately included all patients with positive HCV antibody testing to include those with current or prior risk factors for HAV acquisition. This population does not reflect patients with HCV viremia who received HAV testing or vaccination. Lastly, misattribution of HAV susceptibility could have occurred if patients with negative HAV IgG results were not vaccinated or if patients previously received HAV vaccination outside the VHA.

Conclusion

To mitigate the risk of future HAV outbreaks, continued efforts should be made to increase vaccination among high-risk groups, improve awareness of additional prevention measures, and address risk factors for HAV acquisition, particularly in areas with active outbreaks. Further study is suggested to identify geographic areas with large caseloads of at-risk patients and to highlight best practices utilized by VHA facilities that achieved high vaccine coverage rates. Recommended approaches likely will need to include efforts to improve hygiene and reduce risks for HAV exposure associated with SUD and homelessness.

Click here to read the digital edition.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Maintaining virologic response predicted long-term survival in HBV patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Federal Practitioner
Struggling to reach an HCV vaccine
Federal Practitioner
Good news, bad news about HCV in kidney disease
Federal Practitioner
Hep C–infected livers are safe for transplant
Federal Practitioner
It’s time for universal HCV screening in the ED
Federal Practitioner
Vitamin D–binding protein polymorphisms affect HCV susceptibility
Federal Practitioner
Residential HCV program improves veterans’ diagnosis and care
Federal Practitioner
Baby boomers account for more than 74% of chronic HCV cases
Federal Practitioner
One-time, universal hepatitis C testing cost effective, researchers say
Federal Practitioner
HCV treatment with DAA regimens linked to reduced diabetes risk
Federal Practitioner